
Core i5-13400E

Xeon D-2775TE
Core i5-13400E vs Xeon D-2775TE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400E vs Xeon D-2775TE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400E vs Xeon D-2775TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400E
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +17.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 730, while Xeon D-2775TE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (27,000 vs 27,299).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2775TE, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $221 MSRP, while Xeon D-2775TE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon D-2775TE
2022Why buy it
- β +1.1% higher PassMark.
- β +25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.
- βOlder platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-13400E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400E.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400E better than Xeon D-2775TE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400E vs Xeon D-2775TE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400E
The Core i5-13400E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,000 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-2775TE
The Xeon D-2775TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022β2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,299 points. Launch price was $1,751.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400E packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-2775TE offers 16 cores / 32 threads β the Xeon D-2775TE has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400E versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2775TE β a 39% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400E (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-13400E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon D-2775TE uses Ice Lake-D (2022β2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400E scores 27,000 against the Xeon D-2775TE's 27,299 β a 1.1% lead for the Xeon D-2775TE. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400E vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2775TE.
| Feature | Core i5-13400E | Xeon D-2775TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 16 / 32+60% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+48% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+20% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) | Ice Lake-D (2022β2023) |
| PassMark | 27,000 | 27,299+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,953 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,375 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,977 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon D-2775TE uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400E | Xeon D-2775TE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA2579 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | Yes | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13400E) / not specified (Xeon D-2775TE). The Core i5-13400E includes integrated graphics (UHD 730), while the Xeon D-2775TE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400E targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400E rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400E | Xeon D-2775TE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | UHD 730 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | β |
| Target Use | Productivity | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














