
Core i5-13400E

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Core i5-13400E vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400E vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400E vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400E
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP7/FP8 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 730, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $221 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,852 vs 27,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP7/FP8, while Core i5-13400E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13400E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400E.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400E better than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400E vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400E
The Core i5-13400E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,000 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 26,852 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400E packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400E versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-13400E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400E scores 27,000 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS's 26,852 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-13400E. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400E vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.
| Feature | Core i5-13400E | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz+58% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 8 MB+540% |
| Process | 10 nm | 4 nm-60% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 27,000 | 26,852 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,953 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,375 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,977 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400E | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13400E) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS). The Core i5-13400E includes integrated graphics (UHD 730), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400E targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400E rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400E | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD 730 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













