Core i5-13400E vs EPYC 4244P

Core i5-13400E vs EPYC 4244P Performance Spectrum

Core i5-13400E

10 / 16

27,000

0.0%

27,164

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400E vs EPYC 4244P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400E vs EPYC 4244P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400E

2023

Why buy it

✅+41.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 4244P.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4244P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4244P, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $221 MSRP, while EPYC 4244P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

EPYC 4244P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,244 vs 15,953).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400E.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4244P better than Core i5-13400E?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 4244P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400E is the stronger fit. You are getting 41.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4244P is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400E is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 4244P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $221 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-13400E is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 41.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i5-13400E is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (122.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4244P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), 60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400E vs EPYC 4244P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400E

The Core i5-13400E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,000 points. Launch price was $299.

EPYC 4244P

The EPYC 4244P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,164 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400E packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 4244P offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400E has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400E versus 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4244P — a 10.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 4244P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-13400E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 4244P uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400E scores 27,000 against the EPYC 4244P's 27,164 — a 0.6% lead for the EPYC 4244P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,953 vs 11,244 (34.6% advantage for the Core i5-13400E). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,375 vs 2,602, a 9.1% lead for the EPYC 4244P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,977 vs 11,244 (11.9% advantage for the EPYC 4244P). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400E vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4244P.

Feature	Core i5-13400E	EPYC 4244P
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.1 GHz+11%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.8 GHz+58%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+60%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	5 nm-50%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark	27,000	27,164
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,953+42%	11,244
Geekbench 6 Single	2,375	2,602+10%
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,977	11,244+13%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4244P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-13400E versus DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4244P — the EPYC 4244P supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4244P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400E) vs 28 (EPYC 4244P) — the EPYC 4244P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B760,H770,Z790,H610,Q670 (Core i5-13400E) and B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4244P).

Feature	Core i5-13400E	EPYC 4244P
Socket	LGA1700	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-5200+8%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	192 GB+50%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	28+40%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 4244P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13400E) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4244P). Both include integrated graphics — UHD 730 (Core i5-13400E) and Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4244P) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400E targets Productivity, EPYC 4244P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400E rivals Ryzen 5 7600; EPYC 4244P rivals Xeon E-2436.

Feature	Core i5-13400E	EPYC 4244P
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD 730	Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Target Use	Productivity	Entry Server