Core i5-13400E vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Core i5-13400E vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS Performance Spectrum

Core i5-13400E

10 / 16

27,000

0.0%

27,318

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400E vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400E vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400E

2023

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,953 vs 16,000).
❌Launch MSRP is still $221 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400E.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS better than Core i5-13400E?

Yes. Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 21.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 1.2% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 21.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400E is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $221 MSRP, and it still gives you a 21.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400E is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (122.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i5-13400E vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400E

The Core i5-13400E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,000 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400E packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400E versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (base: 2.4 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i5-13400E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400E scores 27,000 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS's 27,318 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,953 vs 16,000 (0.3% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,375 vs 2,605, a 9.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,977 vs 10,348 (3.7% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400E vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.

Feature	Core i5-13400E	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.2 GHz+13%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	4 GHz+67%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+25%	16 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	8 MB+540%
Process	10 nm	4 nm-60%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark	27,000	27,318+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,953	16,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,375	2,605+10%
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,977	10,348+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-13400E versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400E supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: B760,H770,Z790,H610,Q670 (Core i5-13400E) and SoC (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS).

Feature	Core i5-13400E	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Socket	LGA1700	FP7/FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-5600+17%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13400E) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). Both include integrated graphics — UHD 730 (Core i5-13400E) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400E targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400E rivals Ryzen 5 7600.