Core i5-13400E vs M2 Max

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400E vs M2 Max FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400E vs M2 Max: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400E

2023

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike M2 Max.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 48 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $221 MSRP, while M2 Max mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌80.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 36W.

M2 Max

2023

Why buy it

✅+140% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 36W instead of 65W, a 29W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (26,824 vs 27,000).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400E.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400E better than M2 Max?

Yes. Core i5-13400E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400E is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400E comes in at an unclear MSRP at $221 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (122.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible none + DDR5 setup, M2 Max can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

M2 Max is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i5-13400E vs M2 Max Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400E

The Core i5-13400E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,000 points. Launch price was $299.

M2 Max

The M2 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MB + 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,824 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400E packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the M2 Max offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the M2 Max has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400E versus 3.7 GHz on the M2 Max — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400E (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.424 GHz). The Core i5-13400E is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400E scores 27,000 against the M2 Max's 26,824 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-13400E. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400E vs 48 MB on the M2 Max.

Feature	Core i5-13400E	M2 Max
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	12 / 12+20%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+24%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.424 GHz+1%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	48 MB+140%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	36 MB+2780%
Process	10 nm	5 nm-50%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	27,000	26,824
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,953	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,375	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,977	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M2 Max uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-13400E versus LPDDR5-6400 on the M2 Max — the M2 Max supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400E supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400E) vs 4 (M2 Max). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400E) vs 0 (M2 Max) — the Core i5-13400E offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i5-13400E	M2 Max
Socket	LGA1700	none
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	LPDDR5-6400+33%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+33%	96 GB
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13400E) vs Virtualization (M2 Max). Both include integrated graphics — UHD 730 (Core i5-13400E) and Apple M2 Max GPU (M2 Max) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400E targets Productivity, M2 Max targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400E rivals Ryzen 5 7600.