Core i9-12900H
VS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Core i9-12900H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Intel

Core i9-12900H

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5 GHz2022
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

8 Cores16 Thrd8 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-12900H

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
104%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
101%
#160
Core i9-12900H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
100%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
99%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
96%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
95%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i9-12900H is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i9-12900HRyzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-H (2022) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i9-12900HRyzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-12900H and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Intel

Core i9-12900H

The Core i9-12900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,079 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 26,852 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i9-12900H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-12900H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-12900H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i9-12900H uses the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900H scores 27,079 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS's 26,852 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i9-12900H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900H vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.

FeatureCore i9-12900HRyzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Cores / Threads
14 / 20+75%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5 GHz
5.1 GHz+2%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.8 GHz+52%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+50%
16 MB
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
8 MB+540%
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Alder Lake-H (2022)
Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark
27,079
26,852
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,400
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,900
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-12900H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i9-12900HRyzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Socket
FCBGA1744
FP7/FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i9-12900H) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS). The Core i9-12900H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-12900H targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i9-12900HRyzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
Mobile