
Core i9-12900KS

EPYC 9124
Core i9-12900KS vs EPYC 9124 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-12900KS vs EPYC 9124 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-12900KS vs EPYC 9124: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-12900KS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $344 less on MSRP ($739 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 46.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.9 vs 40.3 PassMark/$ ($739 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 770, while EPYC 9124 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (43,528 vs 43,638).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9124, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 9124
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900KS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.3 vs 58.9 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-12900KS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-12900KS better than EPYC 9124?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-12900KS vs EPYC 9124 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-12900KS
The Core i9-12900KS is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 43,528 points. Launch price was $499.

EPYC 9124
The EPYC 9124 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 43,638 points. Launch price was $1,083.
Processing Power
The Core i9-12900KS packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the EPYC 9124's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core i9-12900KS versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9124 — a 35.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-12900KS (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i9-12900KS uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9124 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900KS scores 43,528 against the EPYC 9124's 43,638 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 9124. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,082 vs 1,770, a 16.2% lead for the Core i9-12900KS that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900KS vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9124.
| Feature | Core i9-12900KS | EPYC 9124 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+43% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+13% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+113% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 43,528 | 43,638 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 27,796 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,082+18% | 1,770 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-12900KS uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9124 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9124 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 4700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-12900KS) vs 12 (EPYC 9124). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-12900KS) vs 128 (EPYC 9124) — the EPYC 9124 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-12900KS) and SP5 (EPYC 9124).
| Feature | Core i9-12900KS | EPYC 9124 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 6144 GB+4700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 12+500% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-12900KS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-12900KS) vs AMD-V (EPYC 9124). The Core i9-12900KS includes integrated graphics (UHD 770), while the EPYC 9124 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9124 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9124 rivals Xeon Gold 6426Y.
| Feature | Core i9-12900KS | EPYC 9124 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-12900KS was priced at $739, while the EPYC 9124 came in at $1083. On launch pricing ($739 vs $1083), Core i9-12900KS was $344 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-12900KS delivers 58.9 pts/$ vs 40.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9124 — making the Core i9-12900KS the 37.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-12900KS | EPYC 9124 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $739-32% | $1083 |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.9+46% | 40.3 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















