Core i9-12900T vs Ryzen 9 7940HS

Intel

Core i9-12900T

16 Cores24 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2022
Core family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 7940HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023
Ryzen family
·······

Core i9-12900T vs Ryzen 9 7940HS Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-12900T vs Ryzen 9 7940HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-12900T vs Ryzen 9 7940HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-12900T

2022

Why buy it

  • +30.8% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
  • +87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $489 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 7940HS.

Ryzen 9 7940HS

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +15.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i9-12900T.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,443 vs 22,809).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 7940HS better than Core i9-12900T?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 9 7940HS is ahead with a 15.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-12900T pulls ahead with 30.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i9-12900T also has the bigger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-12900T is the stronger fit. You are getting 30.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 9 7940HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i9-12900T is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 9 7940HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $489 MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i9-12900T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 30.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i9-12900T is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (60.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 7940HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i9-12900T vs Ryzen 9 7940HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i9-12900T

The Core i9-12900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 29,601 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 9 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,986 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i9-12900T packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-12900T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i9-12900T versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940HS — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS (base: 1.4 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i9-12900T uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900T scores 29,601 against the Ryzen 9 7940HS's 29,986 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 22,809 vs 17,443 (26.7% advantage for the Core i9-12900T). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,331 vs 2,646, a 12.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,116 vs 11,591 (4.4% advantage for the Core i9-12900T). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900T vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940HS.

FeatureCore i9-12900TRyzen 9 7940HS
Cores / Threads
16 / 24+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz
5.2 GHz+6%
Base Clock
1.4 GHz
4 GHz+186%
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)+88%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark
29,601
29,986+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
22,809+31%
17,443
Geekbench 6 Single
2,331
2,646+14%
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,116+5%
11,591
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-12900T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7940HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i9-12900T versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 7940HS — the Ryzen 9 7940HS supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 7940HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-12900T) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 9 7940HS).

FeatureCore i9-12900TRyzen 9 7940HS
Socket
LGA1700
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
DDR5-5600+17%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
256 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 7940HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-12900T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7940HS). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-12900T) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 7940HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7940HS targets Thin-and-light Performance. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7940HS rivals Core i9-13900H.

FeatureCore i9-12900TRyzen 9 7940HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 770
Radeon 780M
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
Thin-and-light Performance