Core i9-13900HK vs M2 Max

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900HK vs M2 Max FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900HK vs M2 Max: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900HK

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 48 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $697 MSRP, while M2 Max mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌25% higher power demand at 45W vs 36W.

M2 Max

2023

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Draws 36W instead of 45W, a 9W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900HK across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (26,824 vs 27,217).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900HK better than M2 Max?

Yes. Core i9-13900HK is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-13900HK is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900HK is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900HK is the better buy right now. Core i9-13900HK comes in at an unclear MSRP at $697 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (39.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13900HK makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 12/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-13900HK vs M2 Max Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900HK

The Core i9-13900HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 27,217 points. Launch price was $697.

M2 Max

The M2 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MB + 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,824 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900HK packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the M2 Max offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-13900HK has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900HK versus 3.7 GHz on the M2 Max — a 37.4% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900HK (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.424 GHz). The Core i9-13900HK is built on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i9-13900HK scores 27,217 against the M2 Max's 26,824 — a 1.5% lead for the Core i9-13900HK. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900HK vs 48 MB on the M2 Max.

Feature	Core i9-13900HK	M2 Max
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+17%	12 / 12
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+46%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+7%	2.424 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	48 MB+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	36 MB+1700%
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	27,217+1%	26,824
Geekbench 6 Single	2,629	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900HK uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M2 Max uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Core i9-13900HK versus LPDDR5-6400 on the M2 Max — the M2 Max supports 23.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 96 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900HK) vs 4 (M2 Max). PCIe lanes: 28 (Core i9-13900HK) vs 0 (M2 Max) — the Core i9-13900HK offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i9-13900HK	M2 Max
Socket	FCBGA1744	none
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	LPDDR5-6400+23%
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	96 GB
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	28	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-13900HK has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i9-13900HK supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900HK) vs Virtualization (M2 Max). Both include integrated graphics — Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Core i9-13900HK) and Apple M2 Max GPU (M2 Max) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M2 Max targets Mobile.