Core i9-13900HK vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

CPU

GPU

Core i9-13900HK

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2023

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

16 Cores32 Thrd180 WWMax: 4 GHz2017

Threadripper family

···

Buy on Amazon

Core i9-13900HK vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Performance Spectrum

Core i9-13900HK

14 / 20

27,217

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

16 / 32

27,487

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900HK vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900HK vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900HK

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $302 less on MSRP ($697 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 41.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.0 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($697 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 180W, a 135W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Ryzen Threadripper 1950X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,217 vs 27,487).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 39.0 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $697 MSRP).
❌300% higher power demand at 180W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900HK moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900HK can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 1950X better than Core i9-13900HK?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper 1950X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13900HK is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Ryzen Threadripper 1950X comes in 43.3% more expensive on MSRP at $999 MSRP versus $697 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i9-13900HK only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 3.5% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13900HK makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-13900HK vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900HK

The Core i9-13900HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 27,217 points. Launch price was $697.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,487 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900HK packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900HK versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900HK (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i9-13900HK uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900HK scores 27,217 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X's 27,487 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,629 vs 1,040, a 86.6% lead for the Core i9-13900HK that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900HK vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.

Feature	Core i9-13900HK	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	16 / 32+14%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+35%	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.4 GHz+31%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	32 MB+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	27,217	27,487
Geekbench 6 Single	2,629+153%	1,040
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	9,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900HK uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Core i9-13900HK versus DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — the Core i9-13900HK supports 95% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900HK) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X). PCIe lanes: 28 (Core i9-13900HK) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i9-13900HK) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X).

Feature	Core i9-13900HK	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Socket	FCBGA1744	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+95%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	256 GB+167%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	64+129%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i9-13900HK supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900HK) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X). The Core i9-13900HK includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 1950X targets Workstation.

Feature	Core i9-13900HK	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Iris Xe Graphics 96EU	—
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-13900HK was priced at $697, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X came in at $999. On launch pricing ($697 vs $999), Core i9-13900HK was $302 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900HK delivers 39.0 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — making the Core i9-13900HK the 34.7% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-13900HK	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP	$697-30%	$999
Performance per Dollar	39.0+42%	27.5
Release Date	2023	2017

Search Core i9-13900HK on Amazon

Search Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.