
Core i9-13900HK

Ryzen 5 7600
Core i9-13900HK vs Ryzen 5 7600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-13900HK vs Ryzen 5 7600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-13900HK vs Ryzen 5 7600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-13900HK
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,629 vs 2,800).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.0 vs 118.0 PassMark/$ ($697 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 7600.
Ryzen 5 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅+6.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Costs $468 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $697 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 202.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 118.0 vs 39.0 PassMark/$ ($229 MSRP vs $697 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-13900HK.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,013 vs 27,217).
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7600 better than Core i9-13900HK?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-13900HK vs Ryzen 5 7600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900HK
The Core i9-13900HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 27,217 points. Launch price was $697.


Ryzen 5 7600
The Ryzen 5 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,013 points. Launch price was $229.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900HK packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-13900HK has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900HK versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900HK (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i9-13900HK uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600 uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900HK scores 27,217 against the Ryzen 5 7600's 27,013 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i9-13900HK. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,629 vs 2,800, a 6.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900HK vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i9-13900HK | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+6% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz+46% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 27,217 | 27,013 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 14,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,629 | 2,800+7% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900HK uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 7600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 28 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i9-13900HK) and A620,B650,X670,B840,B850,X870 (Ryzen 5 7600).
| Feature | Core i9-13900HK | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | 128 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900HK) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600). Both include integrated graphics — Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Core i9-13900HK) and Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 5 7600) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600 rivals Core i5-13400.
| Feature | Core i9-13900HK | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-13900HK was priced at $697, while the Ryzen 5 7600 came in at $229. On launch pricing ($697 vs $229), Ryzen 5 7600 was $468 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900HK delivers 39.0 pts/$ vs 118.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600 — making the Ryzen 5 7600 the 100.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900HK | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $697 | $229-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.0 | 118.0+203% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














