Core i9-13900HX
VS
EPYC 7D12

Core i9-13900HX vs EPYC 7D12

Intel

Core i9-13900HX

24 Cores32 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2023
VS
AMD

EPYC 7D12

32 Cores64 Thrd85 WWMax: 3 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-13900HX

#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
105%
#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
104%
#86
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
103%
#89
Core i9-13900HX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#96
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#97
Core Ultra 5 226V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
92%
#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7D12

#237
Xeon w3-2535
MSRP: $739|Avg: $800
107%
#239
EPYC 7313P
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
106%
#240
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $60
106%
#241
Xeon w5-2555X
MSRP: $1069|Avg: $1145
105%
#242
Xeon E-2246G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $268
105%
#244
Xeon w3-2423
MSRP: $359|Avg: $300
104%
#245
EPYC 8434P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $3137
104%
#247
EPYC 7443P
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $1045
100%
#248
EPYC 4564P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
100%
#249
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
MSRP: $1340|Avg: $1340
100%
#250
EPYC 7D12
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
100%
#251
Xeon W-1390P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $450
100%
#253
Xeon W-2150B
MSRP: $499|Avg: $400
97%
#255
Xeon 6517P
MSRP: $1195|Avg: $1195
97%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
96%
#258
EPYC 9124
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $1083
95%
#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
94%
#261
Xeon w3-2435
MSRP: $669|Avg: $790
94%
#263
Xeon 6710E
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $344
93%
#264
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $180
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($100) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7D12 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i9-13900HXEPYC 7D12
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-HX (2023) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Rome (2020) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i9-13900HX ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($100 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i9-13900HXEPYC 7D12
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900HX and EPYC 7D12

Intel

Core i9-13900HX

The Core i9-13900HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 42,437 points. Launch price was $668.

AMD

EPYC 7D12

The EPYC 7D12 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rome (2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 42,285 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900HX packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 7D12 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7D12 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900HX versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 7D12 — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900HX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core i9-13900HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7D12 uses Rome (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900HX scores 42,437 against the EPYC 7D12's 42,285 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i9-13900HX. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900HX vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7D12.

FeatureCore i9-13900HXEPYC 7D12
Cores / Threads
24 / 32
32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+80%
3 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz+100%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
36 MB (total)+13%
32 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+300%
512 kB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
7 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-HX (2023)
Rome (2020)
PassMark
42,437
42,285
Cinebench R23 Multi
29,493
Geekbench 6 Single
2,878
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,944
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7D12 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i9-13900HX versus 3200 on the EPYC 7D12 — the EPYC 7D12 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7D12 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 GB 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900HX) vs 8 (EPYC 7D12). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900HX) vs 128 (EPYC 7D12) — the EPYC 7D12 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM770,WM790 (Core i9-13900HX) and SP3 (EPYC 7D12).

FeatureCore i9-13900HXEPYC 7D12
Socket
FCBGA1964
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
3200+63900%
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB+4915100%
4096
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
128+540%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-13900HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 7D12 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-13900HX) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7D12). The Core i9-13900HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 7D12 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13900HX targets Performance Gaming / Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX; EPYC 7D12 rivals Xeon Gold 6248.

FeatureCore i9-13900HXEPYC 7D12
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 770
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
Target Use
Performance Gaming / Mobile Workstation