
Core i9-13900HX vs EPYC 9124

Core i9-13900HX

EPYC 9124
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i9-13900HX
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9124
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i9-13900HX | EPYC 9124 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,083) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-HX (2023) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i9-13900HX | EPYC 9124 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,083) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900HX and EPYC 9124

Core i9-13900HX
The Core i9-13900HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 42,437 points. Launch price was $668.

EPYC 9124
The EPYC 9124 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 43,638 points. Launch price was $1,083.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900HX packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 9124 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900HX versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9124 — a 37.4% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900HX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i9-13900HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9124 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900HX scores 42,437 against the EPYC 9124's 43,638 — a 2.8% lead for the EPYC 9124. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,878 vs 1,770, a 47.7% lead for the Core i9-13900HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,944 vs 18,000 (18.6% advantage for the EPYC 9124). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900HX vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9124.
| Feature | Core i9-13900HX | EPYC 9124 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+46% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz+36% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+78% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 42,437 | 43,638+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 29,493 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,878+63% | 1,770 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,944 | 18,000+20% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9124 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 9124 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900HX) vs 12 (EPYC 9124). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900HX) vs 128 (EPYC 9124) — the EPYC 9124 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM770,WM790 (Core i9-13900HX) and SP5 (EPYC 9124).
| Feature | Core i9-13900HX | EPYC 9124 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 6144 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 12+500% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-13900HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9124 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-13900HX) vs AMD-V (EPYC 9124). The Core i9-13900HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 9124 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13900HX targets Performance Gaming / Mobile Workstation, EPYC 9124 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX; EPYC 9124 rivals Xeon Gold 6426Y.
| Feature | Core i9-13900HX | EPYC 9124 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Performance Gaming / Mobile Workstation | Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















