
Core i9-13900HX
Popular choices:

M3 Max 16-Core
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900HX
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike M3 Max 16-Core.
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
M3 Max 16-Core
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900HX across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (41,257 vs 42,437).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-13900HX.
Core i9-13900HX
2023M3 Max 16-Core
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike M3 Max 16-Core.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900HX across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (41,257 vs 42,437).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-13900HX.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900HX better than M3 Max 16-Core?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900HX | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 311 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900HX | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 350 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 252 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 306 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 232 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 256 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 185 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900HX | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 762 FPS | 913 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 749 FPS |
| high | 543 FPS | 676 FPS |
| ultra | 467 FPS | 605 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 680 FPS | 642 FPS |
| medium | 567 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 258 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900HX | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1012 FPS | 914 FPS |
| medium | 905 FPS | 825 FPS |
| high | 792 FPS | 717 FPS |
| ultra | 704 FPS | 621 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 840 FPS | 715 FPS |
| medium | 739 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 568 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 620 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 555 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 491 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 342 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900HX and M3 Max 16-Core

Core i9-13900HX
Core i9-13900HX
The Core i9-13900HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 42,437 points. Launch price was $668.
M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core
The M3 Max 16-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5, LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 41,257 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900HX packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the M3 Max 16-Core offers 16 cores / 16 threads β the Core i9-13900HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900HX versus 4.06 GHz on the M3 Max 16-Core β a 28.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900HX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.748 GHz). The Core i9-13900HX is built on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i9-13900HX scores 42,437 against the M3 Max 16-Core's 41,257 β a 2.8% lead for the Core i9-13900HX.
| Feature | Core i9-13900HX | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+50% | 16 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+33% | 4.06 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.748 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | β |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | β |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | β |
| PassMark | 42,437+3% | 41,257 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 29,493 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,878 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,944 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M3 Max 16-Core uses none (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i9-13900HX versus 6400 on the M3 Max 16-Core β the M3 Max 16-Core supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-13900HX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 β 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900HX) vs 4 (M3 Max 16-Core). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900HX) vs 0 (M3 Max 16-Core) β the Core i9-13900HX offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM770,WM790 (Core i9-13900HX) and Apple M3 (M3 Max 16-Core).
| Feature | Core i9-13900HX | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 | 6400+127900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+157286300% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-13900HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-13900HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M3 Max 16-Core). Both include integrated graphics β UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-13900HX) and Apple M3 Max GPU (40-core) (M3 Max 16-Core) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13900HX targets Performance Gaming / Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX; M3 Max 16-Core rivals Core i9-13950HX.
| Feature | Core i9-13900HX | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Apple M3 Max GPU (40-core) |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d (macOS) |
| Target Use | Performance Gaming / Mobile Workstation | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













