
Core i9-13900K

Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core i9-13900K vs Core Ultra 7 265KF Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-13900K vs Core Ultra 7 265KF FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-13900K vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-13900K
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +20% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 30 MB).
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core Ultra 7 265KF needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 97.5 vs 154.9 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Core Ultra 7 265KF
2024Why buy it
- β Costs $220 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- β Delivers 58.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 154.9 vs 97.5 PassMark/$ ($379 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- β 20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (35,315 vs 40,000).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 36 MB).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900K better than Core Ultra 7 265KF?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-13900K vs Core Ultra 7 265KF Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900K
The Core i9-13900K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 58,373 points. Launch price was $589.

Core Ultra 7 265KF
The Core Ultra 7 265KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024β2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,690 points. Launch price was $379.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900K packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265KF offers 20 cores / 20 threads β the Core i9-13900K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Core i9-13900K versus 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265KF β a 3.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900K (base: 3 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i9-13900K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 265KF uses Arrow Lake-S (2024β2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900K scores 58,373 against the Core Ultra 7 265KF's 58,690 β a 0.5% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265KF. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 40,000 vs 35,315 (12.4% advantage for the Core i9-13900K). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 2,985 vs 3,055, a 2.3% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265KF that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 19,967 vs 20,373 (2% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265KF). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900K vs 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265KF.
| Feature | Core i9-13900K | Core Ultra 7 265KF |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+20% | 20 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+4% | 5.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.9 GHz+30% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total)+20% | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+50% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Arrow Lake-S (2024β2025) |
| PassMark | 58,373 | 58,690 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 40,000+13% | 35,315 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,985 | 3,055+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,967 | 20,373+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265KF uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900K versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265KF β the Core Ultra 7 265KF supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900K) vs 24 (Core Ultra 7 265KF) β the Core Ultra 7 265KF offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel Z690 (Core i9-13900K) and Intel Z890 (Core Ultra 7 265KF).
| Feature | Core i9-13900K | Core Ultra 7 265KF |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-6400+14% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support true virtualization. The Core i9-13900K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core Ultra 7 265KF requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13900K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 265KF rivals Ryzen 7 9700X.
| Feature | Core i9-13900K | Core Ultra 7 265KF |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | true |
| Target Use | Desktop | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-13900K was priced at $599, while the Core Ultra 7 265KF came in at $379. On launch pricing ($599 vs $379), Core Ultra 7 265KF was $220 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900K delivers 97.5 pts/$ vs 154.9 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 265KF β making the Core Ultra 7 265KF the 45.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900K | Core Ultra 7 265KF |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $379-37% |
| Performance per Dollar | 97.5 | 154.9+59% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















