PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900K vs Xeon W-3375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900K vs Xeon W-3375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,352 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Delivers 716.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 97.5 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 270W, a 145W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 57 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3375, which brings 38 cores / 76 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-3375

2021

Why buy it

✅+58.3% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 38 cores / 76 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (17,713 vs 19,967).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 97.5 PassMark/$ ($4,951 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
❌116% higher power demand at 270W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900K better than Xeon W-3375?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-3375 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13900K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-13900K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 21.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900K is the stronger fit. You are getting 12.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900K is the better buy right now. Core i9-13900K comes in $4,352 cheaper on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $4,951 MSRP, and it still gives you a 21.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 716.5% better value on MSRP (97.5 vs 11.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13900K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 32 threads instead of 38/76. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-13900K vs Xeon W-3375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900K

The Core i9-13900K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 58,373 points. Launch price was $589.

Xeon W-3375

The Xeon W-3375 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,091 points. Launch price was $4,499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900K packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-3375 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon W-3375 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Core i9-13900K versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3375 — a 35.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900K (base: 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i9-13900K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-3375 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900K scores 58,373 against the Xeon W-3375's 59,091 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon W-3375. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,985 vs 1,818, a 48.6% lead for the Core i9-13900K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 19,967 vs 17,713 (12% advantage for the Core i9-13900K). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900K vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3375.

Feature	Core i9-13900K	Xeon W-3375
Cores / Threads	24 / 32	38 / 76+58%
Boost Clock	5.7 GHz+43%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+20%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	57 MB (total)+58%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	58,373	59,091+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	40,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,985+64%	1,818
Geekbench 6 Multi	19,967+13%	17,713

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3375 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900K versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon W-3375 — the Core i9-13900K supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3375 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900K) vs 8 (Xeon W-3375). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900K) vs 64 (Xeon W-3375) — the Xeon W-3375 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel Z690 (Core i9-13900K) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3375).

Feature	Core i9-13900K	Xeon W-3375
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+75%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-13900K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support true virtualization. The Core i9-13900K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-3375 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13900K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3375 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	Core i9-13900K	Xeon W-3375
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	true	true
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-13900K was priced at $599, while the Xeon W-3375 came in at $4951. On launch pricing ($599 vs $4951), Core i9-13900K was $4352 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900K delivers 97.5 pts/$ vs 11.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3375 — making the Core i9-13900K the 156.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-13900K	Xeon W-3375
MSRP	$599-88%	$4951
Performance per Dollar	97.5+719%	11.9
Release Date	2022	2021

Search Core i9-13900K on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3375 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.