Core i9-13905H vs EPYC 7282

Core i9-13905H vs EPYC 7282 Performance Spectrum

Core i9-13905H

14 / 20

29,807

0.0%

30,201

+1.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13905H vs EPYC 7282 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13905H vs EPYC 7282: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13905H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1792 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe 96EU, while EPYC 7282 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7282, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7282

2019

Why buy it

✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 12.
✅966.7% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13905H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,500 vs 19,384).
❌Launch MSRP is still $650 MSRP, while Core i9-13905H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i9-13905H moves to FCBGA1792 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13905H better than EPYC 7282?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7282 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13905H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-13905H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13905H is the stronger fit. You are getting 43.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13905H is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7282 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i9-13905H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $650 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7282 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (46.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13905H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FCBGA1792 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 16/32. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-13905H vs EPYC 7282 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13905H

The Core i9-13905H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1792. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 29,807 points. Launch price was $697.

EPYC 7282

The EPYC 7282 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,201 points. Launch price was $650.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13905H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 7282 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7282 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13905H versus 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7282 — a 51.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-13905H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i9-13905H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7282 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13905H scores 29,807 against the EPYC 7282's 30,201 — a 1.3% lead for the EPYC 7282. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,384 vs 13,500 (35.8% advantage for the Core i9-13905H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,300 vs 1,086, a 71.7% lead for the Core i9-13905H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 7,638 (58.8% advantage for the Core i9-13905H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13905H vs 64 MB on the EPYC 7282.

Feature	Core i9-13905H	EPYC 7282
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	16 / 32+14%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+69%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	2.8 GHz+8%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	64 MB+167%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	8 MB+300%
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark	29,807	30,201+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	19,384+44%	13,500
Geekbench 6 Single	2,300+112%	1,086
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,000+83%	7,638

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13905H uses the FCBGA1792 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7282 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Core i9-13905H versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7282 — the Core i9-13905H supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7282 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 6300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13905H) vs 8 (EPYC 7282). PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i9-13905H) vs 128 (EPYC 7282) — the EPYC 7282 offers 116 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM790,HM770 (Core i9-13905H) and SP3,Rome (EPYC 7282).

Feature	Core i9-13905H	EPYC 7282
Socket	FCBGA1792	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+63%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	4096 GB+6300%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	12	128+967%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13905H) vs AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7282). The Core i9-13905H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe 96EU), while the EPYC 7282 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13905H targets Workstation, EPYC 7282 targets Edge Server / Entry Server. Direct competitor: Core i9-13905H rivals Ryzen 9 7940HS; EPYC 7282 rivals Xeon Silver 4216.