Core i9-13905H
VS
Xeon W-3265

Core i9-13905H vs Xeon W-3265

Intel

Core i9-13905H

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Xeon W-3265

24 Cores48 Thrd205 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-13905H

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
107%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
104%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
102%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
102%
#166
Core i9-13905H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
98%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
97%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
94%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
91%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
90%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3265

#498
Xeon E5-1681 V3
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $200
114%
#499
Xeon W-3275
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $1550
114%
#500
Xeon Gold 6138
MSRP: $2612|Avg: $300
113%
#501
Xeon E5-2690 v4
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $389
113%
#502
Xeon Platinum 8362
MSRP: $6236|Avg: $5740
112%
#503
Xeon W-3275M
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $4449
111%
#504
Xeon E5-2660 v3
MSRP: $1445|Avg: $150
110%
#505
Xeon E5-2679 v4
MSRP: $2702|Avg: $500
109%
#506
Xeon E5-2680 v3
MSRP: $1745|Avg: $212
104%
#507
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
MSRP: $5945|Avg: $7000
103%
#508
Xeon E7-8895 v2
MSRP: $6841|Avg: $65
102%
#509
EPYC 9754
MSRP: $11900|Avg: $10631
101%
#509
EPYC 9684X
MSRP: $14756|Avg: $14756
101%
#511
Xeon D-1587
MSRP: $1652|Avg: $1443
101%
#512
Xeon E5-2687W v4
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $1138
101%
#513
Xeon W-3265
MSRP: $3684|Avg: $3400
100%
#514
Xeon E5-2658A V3
MSRP: $1832|Avg: $200
99%
#515
Xeon E5-4640 v4
MSRP: $2837|Avg: N/A
97%
#516
Xeon E7-8867 v3
MSRP: $4672|Avg: $4672
97%
#517
Xeon Gold 6150
MSRP: $3358|Avg: $196
96%
#518
Xeon E5-1680 v3
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $200
94%
#519
Xeon E5-2690 v3
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $85
94%
#520
Xeon 6780E
MSRP: $11350|Avg: $8513
94%
#521
Xeon E5-2697A v4
MSRP: $2891|Avg: $121
92%
#522
Xeon Gold 6134
MSRP: $2214|Avg: $378
91%
#523
Xeon Gold 6138T
MSRP: $2742|Avg: $400
91%
#524
Xeon E7-4880 v2
MSRP: $6619|Avg: $185
90%
#524
Xeon E5-2675 V3
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $100
90%
#524
Xeon E5-2676 V3
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $36
90%
#527
Xeon Platinum 8592+
MSRP: $11600|Avg: $11600
89%
#528
Xeon E5-2687W v3
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $749
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($3,400) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W-3265 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i9-13905HXeon W-3265
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($3,400)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i9-13905H ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($3,400 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i9-13905HXeon W-3265
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($3,400)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13905H and Xeon W-3265

Intel

Core i9-13905H

The Core i9-13905H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1792. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 29,807 points. Launch price was $697.

Intel

Xeon W-3265

The Xeon W-3265 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,105 points. Launch price was $3,349.

Processing Power

The Core i9-13905H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon W-3265 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon W-3265 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13905H versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265 — a 16% clock advantage for the Core i9-13905H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i9-13905H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-3265 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13905H scores 29,807 against the Xeon W-3265's 30,105 — a 1% lead for the Xeon W-3265. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13905H vs 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265.

FeatureCore i9-13905HXeon W-3265
Cores / Threads
14 / 20
24 / 48+71%
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+17%
4.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
2.7 GHz+4%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)
33 MB+38%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
24 MB+1100%
Process
Intel 7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
29,807
30,105
Cinebench R23 Multi
19,384
Geekbench 6 Single
2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13905H uses the FCBGA1792 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3265 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Core i9-13905H versus 2933 on the Xeon W-3265 — the Xeon W-3265 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3265 supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 64 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13905H) vs 6 (Xeon W-3265). PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i9-13905H) vs 64 (Xeon W-3265) — the Xeon W-3265 offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM790,HM770 (Core i9-13905H) and C621,C620 (Xeon W-3265).

FeatureCore i9-13905HXeon W-3265
Socket
FCBGA1792
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200
2933+58560%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+6553500%
1024
RAM Channels
2
6+200%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
64+433%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3265 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13905H) vs true (Xeon W-3265). The Core i9-13905H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe 96EU), while the Xeon W-3265 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13905H targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i9-13905H rivals Ryzen 9 7940HS.

FeatureCore i9-13905HXeon W-3265
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Iris Xe 96EU
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
Target Use
Workstation