Core i9-13905H vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

CPU

GPU

Core i9-13905H

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2023

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

16 Cores32 Thrd180 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2018

Buy on Amazon

Core i9-13905H vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Performance Spectrum

Core i9-13905H

14 / 20

29,807

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

16 / 32

29,462

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13905H vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13905H vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13905H

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 180W, a 135W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1792 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe 96EU, while Ryzen Threadripper 2950X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (19,384 vs 21,444).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 12.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $899 MSRP, while Core i9-13905H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌300% higher power demand at 180W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i9-13905H moves to FCBGA1792 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13905H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 2950X better than Core i9-13905H?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper 2950X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13905H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is the stronger fit. You are getting 10.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper 2950X comes in at an unclear MSRP at $899 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (32.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13905H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1792 and DDR5 instead of TR4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-13905H vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13905H

The Core i9-13905H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1792. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 29,807 points. Launch price was $697.

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 29,462 points. Launch price was $899.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13905H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13905H versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Core i9-13905H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i9-13905H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses ZEN+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13905H scores 29,807 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X's 29,462 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i9-13905H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,384 vs 21,444 (10.1% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,300 vs 1,255, a 58.8% lead for the Core i9-13905H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 8,814 (45.5% advantage for the Core i9-13905H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13905H vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.

Feature	Core i9-13905H	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	16 / 32+14%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+23%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.5 GHz+35%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	32 MB+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	Intel 7 nm-42%	12 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	ZEN+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	29,807+1%	29,462
Cinebench R23 Multi	19,384	21,444+11%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,300+83%	1,255
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,000+59%	8,814

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13905H uses the FCBGA1792 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Core i9-13905H versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — the Core i9-13905H supports 77.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13905H) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i9-13905H) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM790,HM770 (Core i9-13905H) and Socket TR4 / X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X).

Feature	Core i9-13905H	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Socket	FCBGA1792	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+77%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	256 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	12	64+433%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13905H) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). The Core i9-13905H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe 96EU), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13905H targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i9-13905H rivals Ryzen 9 7940HS.