PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13905H vs Xeon Gold 5318H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13905H vs Xeon Gold 5318H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13905H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1792 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe 96EU, while Xeon Gold 5318H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5318H, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 5318H

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 12.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13905H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,000 vs 19,384).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i9-13905H moves to FCBGA1792 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13905H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13905H better than Xeon Gold 5318H?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 5318H makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13905H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-13905H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13905H is the stronger fit. You are getting 7.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13905H still makes the most sense overall. Core i9-13905H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13905H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with FCBGA1792 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 18/36. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-13905H vs Xeon Gold 5318H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13905H

The Core i9-13905H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1792. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 29,807 points. Launch price was $697.

Xeon Gold 5318H

The Xeon Gold 5318H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Cooper Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 RDIMM. Passmark benchmark score: 29,301 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13905H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5318H offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon Gold 5318H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13905H versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5318H — a 34.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13905H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i9-13905H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5318H uses Cooper Lake-SP (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13905H scores 29,807 against the Xeon Gold 5318H's 29,301 — a 1.7% lead for the Core i9-13905H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,384 vs 18,000 (7.4% advantage for the Core i9-13905H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,300 vs 1,063, a 73.6% lead for the Core i9-13905H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 15,000 (6.9% advantage for the Xeon Gold 5318H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13905H vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5318H.

Feature	Core i9-13905H	Xeon Gold 5318H
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	18 / 36+29%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+42%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+4%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	24.75 MB (total)+3%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Cooper Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	29,807+2%	29,301
Cinebench R23 Multi	19,384+8%	18,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,300+116%	1,063
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,000	15,000+7%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13905H uses the FCBGA1792 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5318H uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Core i9-13905H versus DDR4-2667 on the Xeon Gold 5318H — the Core i9-13905H supports 95% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5318H supports up to 1152 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13905H) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 5318H). PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i9-13905H) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 5318H) — the Xeon Gold 5318H offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM790,HM770 (Core i9-13905H) and C620 Series (Xeon Gold 5318H).

Feature	Core i9-13905H	Xeon Gold 5318H
Socket	FCBGA1792	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+95%	DDR4-2667
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	1152 GB+1700%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	12	48+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 5318H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13905H) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 5318H). The Core i9-13905H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe 96EU), while the Xeon Gold 5318H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13905H targets Workstation, Xeon Gold 5318H targets Cloud Infrastructure / Virtualization. Direct competitor: Core i9-13905H rivals Ryzen 9 7940HS; Xeon Gold 5318H rivals EPYC 7352.

Feature	Core i9-13905H	Xeon Gold 5318H
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Iris Xe 96EU	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Workstation	Cloud Infrastructure / Virtualization