PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-14900HX vs Core Ultra 5 245KF FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-14900HX vs Core Ultra 5 245KF: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-14900HX

2024

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core Ultra 5 245KF.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.9 vs 147.7 PassMark/$ ($668 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).

Core Ultra 5 245KF

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $374 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
✅Delivers 120.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 147.7 vs 66.9 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (43,424 vs 44,685).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 36 MB).
❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-14900HX.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-14900HX better than Core Ultra 5 245KF?

Yes. Core i9-14900HX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-14900HX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-14900HX is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.9% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-14900HX is still the faster CPU overall, but Core Ultra 5 245KF is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i9-14900HX comes in 127.2% more expensive on MSRP at $668 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core Ultra 5 245KF is also 120.8% better value on MSRP (147.7 vs 66.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-14900HX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 50% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 32 threads instead of 14/14. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-14900HX vs Core Ultra 5 245KF Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-14900HX

The Core i9-14900HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 44,685 points. Launch price was $499.

Core Ultra 5 245KF

The Core Ultra 5 245KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 43,424 points. Launch price was $294.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-14900HX packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 245KF offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the Core i9-14900HX has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Core i9-14900HX versus 5.2 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245KF — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900HX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i9-14900HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 245KF uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900HX scores 44,685 against the Core Ultra 5 245KF's 43,424 — a 2.9% lead for the Core i9-14900HX. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900HX vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245KF.

Feature	Core i9-14900HX	Core Ultra 5 245KF
Cores / Threads	24 / 32+71%	14 / 14
Boost Clock	5.7 GHz+10%	5.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	4.2 GHz+91%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)+50%	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	3 MB (per core)+50%
Process	Intel 7 nm	3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024)	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
PassMark	44,685+3%	43,424
Cinebench R23 Multi	35,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	3,000	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	17,500	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-14900HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 245KF uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i9-14900HX versus 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245KF — the Core Ultra 5 245KF supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM770,WM790 (Core i9-14900HX) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245KF).

Feature	Core i9-14900HX	Core Ultra 5 245KF
Socket	FCBGA1964	LGA1851
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200	6400+14%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	192 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-14900HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 245KF). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-14900HX) and Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 5 245KF) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-14900HX targets Flagship Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i9-14900HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX; Core Ultra 5 245KF rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.

Feature	Core i9-14900HX	Core Ultra 5 245KF
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Flagship Gaming Laptop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-14900HX was priced at $668, while the Core Ultra 5 245KF came in at $294. On launch pricing ($668 vs $294), Core Ultra 5 245KF was $374 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900HX delivers 66.9 pts/$ vs 147.7 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 245KF — making the Core Ultra 5 245KF the 75.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-14900HX	Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP	$668	$294-56%
Performance per Dollar	66.9	147.7+121%
Release Date	2024	2024

Search Core i9-14900HX on Amazon

Search Core Ultra 5 245KF on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.