
Core i9-14900HX
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 245KF
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-14900HX
2024Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core Ultra 5 245KF.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.9 vs 147.7 PassMark/$ ($668 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
Core Ultra 5 245KF
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $374 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 120.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 147.7 vs 66.9 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (43,424 vs 44,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-14900HX.
Core i9-14900HX
2024Core Ultra 5 245KF
2024Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core Ultra 5 245KF.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $374 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 120.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 147.7 vs 66.9 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.9 vs 147.7 PassMark/$ ($668 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (43,424 vs 44,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-14900HX.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-14900HX better than Core Ultra 5 245KF?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-14900HX | Core Ultra 5 245KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 264 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-14900HX | Core Ultra 5 245KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 687 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 355 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 314 FPS | 438 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 596 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 522 FPS |
| high | 317 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 377 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 263 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-14900HX | Core Ultra 5 245KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 761 FPS | 851 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 694 FPS |
| high | 542 FPS | 617 FPS |
| ultra | 466 FPS | 528 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 681 FPS | 731 FPS |
| medium | 568 FPS | 599 FPS |
| high | 486 FPS | 521 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 334 FPS | 324 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-14900HX | Core Ultra 5 245KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1001 FPS | 1086 FPS |
| medium | 896 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 783 FPS | 889 FPS |
| ultra | 696 FPS | 808 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 831 FPS | 892 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 789 FPS |
| high | 639 FPS | 687 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 611 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 489 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 432 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-14900HX and Core Ultra 5 245KF

Core i9-14900HX
Core i9-14900HX
The Core i9-14900HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 44,685 points. Launch price was $499.

Core Ultra 5 245KF
Core Ultra 5 245KF
The Core Ultra 5 245KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 43,424 points. Launch price was $294.
Processing Power
The Core i9-14900HX packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 245KF offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the Core i9-14900HX has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Core i9-14900HX versus 5.2 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245KF — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900HX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i9-14900HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 245KF uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900HX scores 44,685 against the Core Ultra 5 245KF's 43,424 — a 2.9% lead for the Core i9-14900HX. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900HX vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245KF.
| Feature | Core i9-14900HX | Core Ultra 5 245KF |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+71% | 14 / 14 |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+10% | 5.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz+91% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total)+50% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+50% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 44,685+3% | 43,424 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 35,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-14900HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 245KF uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i9-14900HX versus 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245KF — the Core Ultra 5 245KF supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM770,WM790 (Core i9-14900HX) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245KF).
| Feature | Core i9-14900HX | Core Ultra 5 245KF |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 | 6400+127900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+104857500% | 192 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-14900HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 245KF). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-14900HX) and Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 5 245KF) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-14900HX targets Flagship Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i9-14900HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX; Core Ultra 5 245KF rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.
| Feature | Core i9-14900HX | Core Ultra 5 245KF |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Flagship Gaming Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-14900HX launched at $668 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 245KF debuted at $294. On MSRP ($668 vs $294), the Core Ultra 5 245KF is $374 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900HX delivers 66.9 pts/$ vs 147.7 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 245KF — making the Core Ultra 5 245KF the 75.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-14900HX | Core Ultra 5 245KF |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $668 | $294-56% |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.9 | 147.7+121% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













