
Core i9-14900HX

Xeon Platinum 8352M
Core i9-14900HX vs Xeon Platinum 8352M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-14900HX vs Xeon Platinum 8352M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-14900HX vs Xeon Platinum 8352M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-14900HX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,803 less on MSRP ($668 MSRP vs $4,471 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 573.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.9 vs 9.9 PassMark/$ ($668 MSRP vs $4,471 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 185W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 48 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8352M, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Platinum 8352M
2021Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-14900HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (44,406 vs 44,685).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 66.9 PassMark/$ ($4,471 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
- ❌236.4% higher power demand at 185W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i9-14900HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-14900HX better than Xeon Platinum 8352M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-14900HX vs Xeon Platinum 8352M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-14900HX
The Core i9-14900HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 44,685 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon Platinum 8352M
The Xeon Platinum 8352M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 44,406 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i9-14900HX packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8352M offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8352M has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Core i9-14900HX versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352M — a 47.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900HX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i9-14900HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8352M uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900HX scores 44,685 against the Xeon Platinum 8352M's 44,406 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i9-14900HX. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900HX vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8352M.
| Feature | Core i9-14900HX | Xeon Platinum 8352M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+63% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 48 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 44,685 | 44,406 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 35,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-14900HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8352M uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i9-14900HX versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8352M — the Core i9-14900HX supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8352M supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-14900HX) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8352M). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900HX) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352M) — the Xeon Platinum 8352M offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM770,WM790 (Core i9-14900HX) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352M).
| Feature | Core i9-14900HX | Xeon Platinum 8352M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200+75% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 64+220% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-14900HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8352M supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-14900HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8352M). The Core i9-14900HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon Platinum 8352M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-14900HX targets Flagship Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i9-14900HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX; Xeon Platinum 8352M rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | Core i9-14900HX | Xeon Platinum 8352M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Flagship Gaming Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-14900HX was priced at $668, while the Xeon Platinum 8352M came in at $4471. On launch pricing ($668 vs $4471), Core i9-14900HX was $3803 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900HX delivers 66.9 pts/$ vs 9.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8352M — making the Core i9-14900HX the 148.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-14900HX | Xeon Platinum 8352M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $668-85% | $4471 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.9+576% | 9.9 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















