
Core i9-14900HX

Xeon w5-3435X
Core i9-14900HX vs Xeon w5-3435X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-14900HX vs Xeon w5-3435X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-14900HX vs Xeon w5-3435X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-14900HX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $921 less on MSRP ($668 MSRP vs $1,589 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 135.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.9 vs 28.4 PassMark/$ ($668 MSRP vs $1,589 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 270W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon w5-3435X needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon w5-3435X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (44,685 vs 45,086).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-3435X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
Xeon w5-3435X
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅460% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 28.4 vs 66.9 PassMark/$ ($1,589 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
- ❌390.9% higher power demand at 270W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-14900HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-14900HX.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-14900HX better than Xeon w5-3435X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-14900HX vs Xeon w5-3435X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-14900HX
The Core i9-14900HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 44,685 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon w5-3435X
The Xeon w5-3435X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 45,086 points. Launch price was $1,589.
Processing Power
The Core i9-14900HX packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w5-3435X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-14900HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Core i9-14900HX versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon w5-3435X — a 19.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900HX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i9-14900HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon w5-3435X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900HX scores 44,685 against the Xeon w5-3435X's 45,086 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon w5-3435X. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900HX vs 45 MB on the Xeon w5-3435X.
| Feature | Core i9-14900HX | Xeon w5-3435X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+21% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz+41% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 45 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 44,685 | 45,086 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 35,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-14900HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w5-3435X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i9-14900HX versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-3435X — the Core i9-14900HX supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w5-3435X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-14900HX) vs 8 (Xeon w5-3435X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900HX) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3435X) — the Xeon w5-3435X offers 92 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM770,WM790 (Core i9-14900HX) and W790 (Xeon w5-3435X).
| Feature | Core i9-14900HX | Xeon w5-3435X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200+17% | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 112+460% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Xeon w5-3435X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-14900HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w5-3435X). The Core i9-14900HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon w5-3435X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-14900HX targets Flagship Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i9-14900HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX; Xeon w5-3435X rivals Threadripper PRO 7955WX.
| Feature | Core i9-14900HX | Xeon w5-3435X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Flagship Gaming Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-14900HX was priced at $668, while the Xeon w5-3435X came in at $1589. On launch pricing ($668 vs $1589), Core i9-14900HX was $921 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900HX delivers 66.9 pts/$ vs 28.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-3435X — making the Core i9-14900HX the 80.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-14900HX | Xeon w5-3435X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $668-58% | $1589 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.9+136% | 28.4 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















