PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-14900T vs Xeon 6724P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-14900T vs Xeon 6724P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-14900T

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,073 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
✅Delivers 561.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 69.5 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 210W, a 175W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon 6724P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 72 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6724P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon 6724P

2025

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (38,061 vs 38,168).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 69.5 PassMark/$ ($3,622 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
❌500% higher power demand at 210W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-14900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-14900T better than Xeon 6724P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 6724P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-14900T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-14900T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-14900T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-14900T is the better buy right now. Core i9-14900T comes in $3,073 cheaper on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $3,622 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 561.6% better value on MSRP (69.5 vs 10.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6724P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024), 100% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 36 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-14900T vs Xeon 6724P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-14900T

The Core i9-14900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,168 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon 6724P

The Xeon 6724P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 38,061 points. Launch price was $3,622.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-14900T packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon 6724P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-14900T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-14900T versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon 6724P — a 24.5% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900T (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i9-14900T uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6724P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900T scores 38,168 against the Xeon 6724P's 38,061 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i9-14900T. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900T vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6724P.

Feature	Core i9-14900T	Xeon 6724P
Cores / Threads	24 / 32+50%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.5 GHz+28%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	3.6 GHz+227%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	72 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	38,168	38,061
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,800
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	25,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-14900T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6724P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-14900T versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6724P — the Xeon 6724P supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6724P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-14900T) vs 8 (Xeon 6724P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900T) vs 88 (Xeon 6724P) — the Xeon 6724P offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i9-14900T) and C741 (Xeon 6724P).

Feature	Core i9-14900T	Xeon 6724P
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	5600	DDR5-6400+14%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	88+340%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6724P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i9-14900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon 6724P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon 6724P targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i9-14900T rivals Ryzen 9 7900; Xeon 6724P rivals EPYC 9554.

Feature	Core i9-14900T	Xeon 6724P
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-14900T was priced at $549, while the Xeon 6724P came in at $3622. On launch pricing ($549 vs $3622), Core i9-14900T was $3073 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900T delivers 69.5 pts/$ vs 10.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6724P — making the Core i9-14900T the 147.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-14900T	Xeon 6724P
MSRP	$549-85%	$3622
Performance per Dollar	69.5+562%	10.5
Release Date	2024	2025

Search Core i9-14900T on Amazon

Search Xeon 6724P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.