PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700F vs Core i9-14900T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700F vs Core i9-14900T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700F

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $190 less on MSRP ($359 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Delivers 53.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 106.4 vs 69.5 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes (Intel Laminar RM1)), unlike Core i9-14900T.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-14900T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 36 MB).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-14900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i9-14900T

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i7-13700F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (38,168 vs 38,212).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 69.5 vs 106.4 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-13700F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-14900T better than Core i7-13700F?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i9-14900T is ahead with a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700F pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Core i9-14900T also has the bigger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700F is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-14900T is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i7-13700F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i9-14900T comes in 52.9% more expensive on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $359 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i7-13700F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. Core i7-13700F is also 53.1% better value on MSRP (106.4 vs 69.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-14900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and 20% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 30 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-13700F vs Core i9-14900T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700F

The Core i7-13700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,212 points. Launch price was $359.

Core i9-14900T

The Core i9-14900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,168 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700F packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Core i9-14900T offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-14900T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700F versus 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-14900T — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900T (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core i7-13700F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-14900T uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700F scores 38,212 against the Core i9-14900T's 38,168 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-13700F. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700F vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900T.

Feature	Core i7-13700F	Core i9-14900T
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	24 / 32+50%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz	5.5 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+91%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	36 MB (total)+20%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark	38,212	38,168
Cinebench R23 Multi	24,775	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,676	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,254	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i7-13700F) and Z790,B760 (Core i9-14900T).

Feature	Core i7-13700F	Core i9-14900T
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200	5600
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	192 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-13700F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-14900T). The Core i9-14900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i7-13700F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-13700F targets High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700F rivals Ryzen 7 7700X; Core i9-14900T rivals Ryzen 9 7900.

Feature	Core i7-13700F	Core i9-14900T
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	High-end Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13700F was priced at $359, while the Core i9-14900T came in at $549. On launch pricing ($359 vs $549), Core i7-13700F was $190 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700F delivers 106.4 pts/$ vs 69.5 pts/$ for the Core i9-14900T — making the Core i7-13700F the 42% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-13700F	Core i9-14900T
MSRP	$359-35%	$549
Performance per Dollar	106.4+53%	69.5
Release Date	2023	2024

Search Core i7-13700F on Amazon

Search Core i9-14900T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.