Core i7-13700F vs EPYC 7551P

Core i7-13700F vs EPYC 7551P Performance Spectrum

Core i7-13700F

16 / 24

38,212

+0.3%

38,111

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700F vs EPYC 7551P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700F vs EPYC 7551P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,741 less on MSRP ($359 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 486.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 106.4 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7551P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

EPYC 7551P

2017

Why buy it

✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (38,111 vs 38,212).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.1 vs 106.4 PassMark/$ ($2,100 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700F better than EPYC 7551P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7551P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700F is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700F is the better buy right now. Core i7-13700F comes in $1,741 cheaper on MSRP at $359 MSRP versus $2,100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 486.5% better value on MSRP (106.4 vs 18.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 32/64. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13700F vs EPYC 7551P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700F

The Core i7-13700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,212 points. Launch price was $359.

EPYC 7551P

The EPYC 7551P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 38,111 points. Launch price was $2,100.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700F packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 7551P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7551P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700F versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 7551P — a 53.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700F (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-13700F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7551P uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700F scores 38,212 against the EPYC 7551P's 38,111 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-13700F. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700F vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7551P.

Feature	Core i7-13700F	EPYC 7551P
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	32 / 64+100%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+73%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+5%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+113%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark	38,212	38,111
Cinebench R23 Multi	24,775	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,676	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,254	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7551P uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-13700F versus 2666 on the EPYC 7551P — the Core i7-13700F supports 110.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7551P supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 966.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700F) vs 8 (EPYC 7551P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700F) vs 128 (EPYC 7551P) — the EPYC 7551P offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i7-13700F) and SP3 (EPYC 7551P).

Feature	Core i7-13700F	EPYC 7551P
Socket	LGA1700	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200+110%	2666
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	2048 GB+967%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 7551P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-13700F) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7551P). Primary use case: Core i7-13700F targets High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700F rivals Ryzen 7 7700X; EPYC 7551P rivals Xeon Platinum 8160.

Feature	Core i7-13700F	EPYC 7551P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	AMD-V, IOMMU
Target Use	High-end Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13700F was priced at $359, while the EPYC 7551P came in at $2100. On launch pricing ($359 vs $2100), Core i7-13700F was $1741 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700F delivers 106.4 pts/$ vs 18.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 7551P — making the Core i7-13700F the 141.7% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-13700F	EPYC 7551P
MSRP	$359-83%	$2100
Performance per Dollar	106.4+488%	18.1
Release Date	2023	2017

Search Core i7-13700F on Amazon

Search EPYC 7551P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.