Core i7-13700F vs M4 Pro (14 cores)

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700F vs M4 Pro (14 cores) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700F vs M4 Pro (14 cores): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes (Intel Laminar RM1)), unlike M4 Pro (14 cores).

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $359 MSRP, while M4 Pro (14 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while M4 Pro (14 cores) can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

M4 Pro (14 cores)

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core), while Core i7-13700F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (38,127 vs 38,212).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-13700F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700F better than M4 Pro (14 cores)?

Yes. Core i7-13700F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700F is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700F is the better buy right now. Core i7-13700F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $359 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (106.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible none + DDR5 setup, M4 Pro (14 cores) can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

M4 Pro (14 cores) makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13700F vs M4 Pro (14 cores) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700F

The Core i7-13700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,212 points. Launch price was $359.

M4 Pro (14 cores)

The M4 Pro (14 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.59 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 38,127 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700F packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the M4 Pro (14 cores) offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the Core i7-13700F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700F versus 4.5 GHz on the M4 Pro (14 cores) — a 14.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700F (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.59 GHz). The Core i7-13700F is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-13700F scores 38,212 against the M4 Pro (14 cores)'s 38,127 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-13700F.

Feature	Core i7-13700F	M4 Pro (14 cores)
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+14%	14 / 14
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+16%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.59 GHz+23%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm	3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	38,212	38,127
Cinebench R23 Multi	24,775	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,676	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,254	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M4 Pro (14 cores) uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-13700F versus 8533 on the M4 Pro (14 cores) — the M4 Pro (14 cores) supports 52.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700F) vs 0 (M4 Pro (14 cores)). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700F) vs 0 (M4 Pro (14 cores)) — the Core i7-13700F offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i7-13700F) and Apple M4 (M4 Pro (14 cores)).

Feature	Core i7-13700F	M4 Pro (14 cores)
Socket	LGA1700	none
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200	8533+52%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+200%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	0
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-13700F) vs VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M4 Pro (14 cores)). The M4 Pro (14 cores) includes integrated graphics (Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core)), while the Core i7-13700F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-13700F targets High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700F rivals Ryzen 7 7700X; M4 Pro (14 cores) rivals Core Ultra 7 258V.

Feature	Core i7-13700F	M4 Pro (14 cores)
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d (macOS)
Target Use	High-end Gaming	—