Core i7-13700F vs M4 Max (14 cores)

Intel

Core i7-13700F

16 Cores24 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023
Core family
·······
VS

M4 Max (14 cores)

14 Cores14 Thrd4 WWMax: 4.51 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-13700F vs M4 Max (14 cores) Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700F vs M4 Max (14 cores) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700F vs M4 Max (14 cores): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700F

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes (Intel Laminar RM1)), unlike M4 Max (14 cores).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (38,212 vs 38,558).
  • Launch MSRP is still $359 MSRP, while M4 Max (14 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
  • No integrated graphics, while M4 Max (14 cores) can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

M4 Max (14 cores)

2024

Why buy it

  • +0.9% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M4 Max GPU (32-core), while Core i7-13700F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-13700F.

Quick Answers

So, is M4 Max (14 cores) better than Core i7-13700F?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-13700F is ahead with a 10.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, M4 Max (14 cores) pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M4 Max (14 cores) is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 14 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
M4 Max (14 cores) is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i7-13700F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. M4 Max (14 cores) comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $359 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-13700F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 10.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-13700F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (106.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Core i7-13700F is still an elite gaming CPU and a very strong platform-matched choice because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap while remaining one of the strongest gaming chips you can buy.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
M4 Max (14 cores) makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 14 threads instead of 16/24. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13700F vs M4 Max (14 cores) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-13700F

The Core i7-13700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,212 points. Launch price was $359.

M4 Max (14 cores)

The M4 Max (14 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 November 2024 (1 year ago). It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.59 GHz, with boost up to 4.51 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 38,558 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700F packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the M4 Max (14 cores) offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the Core i7-13700F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700F versus 4.51 GHz on the M4 Max (14 cores) — a 14.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700F (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.59 GHz). The Core i7-13700F is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-13700F scores 38,212 against the M4 Max (14 cores)'s 38,558 — a 0.9% lead for the M4 Max (14 cores).

FeatureCore i7-13700FM4 Max (14 cores)
Cores / Threads
16 / 24+14%
14 / 14
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz+15%
4.51 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.59 GHz+23%
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
38,212
38,558
Cinebench R23 Multi
24,775
Geekbench 6 Single
2,676
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,254
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M4 Max (14 cores) uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-13700F versus 8533 on the M4 Max (14 cores) — the M4 Max (14 cores) supports 52.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700F) vs 0 (M4 Max (14 cores)). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700F) vs 0 (M4 Max (14 cores)) — the Core i7-13700F offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i7-13700F) and Apple M4 (M4 Max (14 cores)).

FeatureCore i7-13700FM4 Max (14 cores)
Socket
LGA1700
none
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
8533+52%
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB+50%
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
0
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
20
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-13700F) vs VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M4 Max (14 cores)). The M4 Max (14 cores) includes integrated graphics (Apple M4 Max GPU (32-core)), while the Core i7-13700F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-13700F targets High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700F rivals Ryzen 7 7700X; M4 Max (14 cores) rivals Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.

FeatureCore i7-13700FM4 Max (14 cores)
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Apple M4 Max GPU (32-core)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d (macOS)
Target Use
High-end Gaming