
Core i7-13700F

Xeon Gold 6426Y
Core i7-13700F vs Xeon Gold 6426Y Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-13700F vs Xeon Gold 6426Y FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-13700F vs Xeon Gold 6426Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-13700F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,786 less on MSRP ($359 MSRP vs $2,145 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 501.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 106.4 vs 17.7 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $2,145 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 185W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes (Intel Laminar RM1)), unlike Xeon Gold 6426Y.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6426Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 38 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6426Y, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 6426Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (38 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (37,944 vs 38,212).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.7 vs 106.4 PassMark/$ ($2,145 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ❌184.6% higher power demand at 185W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-13700F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700F better than Xeon Gold 6426Y?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-13700F vs Xeon Gold 6426Y Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700F
The Core i7-13700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,212 points. Launch price was $359.

Xeon Gold 6426Y
The Xeon Gold 6426Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 37,944 points. Launch price was $1,517.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700F packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the Xeon Gold 6426Y's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700F versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6426Y — a 23.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700F (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-13700F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6426Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700F scores 38,212 against the Xeon Gold 6426Y's 37,944 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-13700F. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700F vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6426Y.
| Feature | Core i7-13700F | Xeon Gold 6426Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+27% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.5 GHz+19% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 37.5 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 38,212 | 37,944 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 24,775 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,676 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,254 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6426Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-13700F versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6426Y — the Core i7-13700F supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6426Y supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700F) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6426Y). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700F) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6426Y) — the Xeon Gold 6426Y offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i7-13700F) and LGA4677 (Xeon Gold 6426Y).
| Feature | Core i7-13700F | Xeon Gold 6426Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200+17% | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 80+300% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6426Y supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-13700F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6426Y). Primary use case: Core i7-13700F targets High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700F rivals Ryzen 7 7700X; Xeon Gold 6426Y rivals EPYC 8124P.
| Feature | Core i7-13700F | Xeon Gold 6426Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-end Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-13700F was priced at $359, while the Xeon Gold 6426Y came in at $2145. On launch pricing ($359 vs $2145), Core i7-13700F was $1786 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700F delivers 106.4 pts/$ vs 17.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6426Y — making the Core i7-13700F the 143% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700F | Xeon Gold 6426Y |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $359-83% | $2145 |
| Performance per Dollar | 106.4+501% | 17.7 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















