PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700F vs Xeon Platinum 8180 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700F vs Xeon Platinum 8180: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $9,650 less on MSRP ($359 MSRP vs $10,009 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2684.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 106.4 vs 3.8 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $10,009 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes (Intel Laminar RM1)), unlike Xeon Platinum 8180.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (38,212 vs 38,259).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 39 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8180, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Platinum 8180

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅+28.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 106.4 PassMark/$ ($10,009 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-13700F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700F better than Xeon Platinum 8180?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Platinum 8180 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8180 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 28.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700F is the better buy right now. Core i7-13700F comes in $9,650 cheaper on MSRP at $359 MSRP versus $10,009 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8180 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 2684.6% better value on MSRP (106.4 vs 3.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13700F vs Xeon Platinum 8180 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700F

The Core i7-13700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,212 points. Launch price was $359.

Xeon Platinum 8180

The Xeon Platinum 8180 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 38,259 points. Launch price was $10,009.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700F packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8180 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8180 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700F versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8180 — a 31.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700F (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-13700F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8180 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700F scores 38,212 against the Xeon Platinum 8180's 38,259 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8180. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700F vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8180.

Feature	Core i7-13700F	Xeon Platinum 8180
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	28 / 56+75%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+37%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.5 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	38.5 MB (total)+28%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	38,212	38,259
Cinebench R23 Multi	24,775	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,676	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,254	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8180 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-13700F versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8180 — the Core i7-13700F supports 110.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8180 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700F) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8180). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700F) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8180) — the Xeon Platinum 8180 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i7-13700F) and Intel C621 (Xeon Platinum 8180).

Feature	Core i7-13700F	Xeon Platinum 8180
Socket	LGA1700	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200+110%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	768 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-13700F) / not specified (Xeon Platinum 8180). Primary use case: Core i7-13700F targets High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700F rivals Ryzen 7 7700X.

Feature	Core i7-13700F	Xeon Platinum 8180
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	High-end Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13700F was priced at $359, while the Xeon Platinum 8180 came in at $10009. On launch pricing ($359 vs $10009), Core i7-13700F was $9650 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700F delivers 106.4 pts/$ vs 3.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8180 — making the Core i7-13700F the 186.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-13700F	Xeon Platinum 8180
MSRP	$359-96%	$10009
Performance per Dollar	106.4+2700%	3.8
Release Date	2023	2017

Search Core i7-13700F on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8180 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.