
Core i7-13700F

Ryzen 9 3950X
Core i7-13700F vs Ryzen 9 3950X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-13700F vs Ryzen 9 3950X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-13700F vs Ryzen 9 3950X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-13700F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $390 less on MSRP ($359 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 107.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 106.4 vs 51.4 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes (Intel Laminar RM1)), unlike Ryzen 9 3950X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 3950X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (38,212 vs 38,519).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 3950X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.4 vs 106.4 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-13700F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 3950X better than Core i7-13700F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-13700F vs Ryzen 9 3950X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700F
The Core i7-13700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,212 points. Launch price was $359.


Ryzen 9 3950X
The Ryzen 9 3950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 38,519 points. Launch price was $799.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700F packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the Ryzen 9 3950X's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700F versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3950X — a 10.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700F (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-13700F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 3950X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700F scores 38,212 against the Ryzen 9 3950X's 38,519 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 3950X. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700F vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3950X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700F | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+11% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz+67% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 64 MB+113% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 38,212 | 38,519 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 24,775 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,676 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,254 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 3950X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-13700F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 3950X — the Core i7-13700F supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700F) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 3950X) — the Ryzen 9 3950X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i7-13700F) and X570,B550 (Ryzen 9 3950X).
| Feature | Core i7-13700F | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200+75% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 3950X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-13700F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 3950X). Primary use case: Core i7-13700F targets High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700F rivals Ryzen 7 7700X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700F | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-end Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-13700F was priced at $359, while the Ryzen 9 3950X came in at $749. On launch pricing ($359 vs $749), Core i7-13700F was $390 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700F delivers 106.4 pts/$ vs 51.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 3950X — making the Core i7-13700F the 69.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700F | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $359-52% | $749 |
| Performance per Dollar | 106.4+107% | 51.4 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














