
Core i9-7960X

Xeon W-2275
Core i9-7960X vs Xeon W-2275 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-7960X vs Xeon W-2275 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-7960X vs Xeon W-2275: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-7960X
2017Why buy it
- β +16.8% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2275 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2275, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 16.5 vs 25.2 PassMark/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $1,112 MSRP).
Xeon W-2275
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +26.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 44.
- β Costs $587 less on MSRP ($1,112 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
- β Delivers 52.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.2 vs 16.5 PassMark/$ ($1,112 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
- β 9.1% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 44) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (19,000 vs 22,189).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-2275 better than Core i9-7960X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-7960X vs Xeon W-2275 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-7960X
The Core i9-7960X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017β2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 28,020 points. Launch price was $1,699.

Xeon W-2275
The Xeon W-2275 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,974 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i9-7960X packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-2275 offers 14 cores / 28 threads β the Core i9-7960X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7960X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-2275 β a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2275 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i9-7960X is built on the Skylake (server) (2017β2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i9-7960X scores 28,020 against the Xeon W-2275's 27,974 β a 0.2% lead for the Core i9-7960X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 22,189 vs 19,000 (15.5% advantage for the Core i9-7960X). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 1,394 vs 1,596, a 13.5% lead for the Xeon W-2275 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 22 MB (total) on the Core i9-7960X vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon W-2275.
| Feature | Core i9-7960X | Xeon W-2275 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+14% | 14 / 28 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.3 GHz+18% |
| L3 Cache | 22 MB (total)+14% | 19.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | β |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017β2018) | β |
| PassMark | 28,020 | 27,974 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 22,189+17% | 19,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,394 | 1,596+14% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 11,000 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA2066 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the Core i9-7960X versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-2275 β the Xeon W-2275 supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2275 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 44 (Core i9-7960X) vs 48 (Xeon W-2275) β the Xeon W-2275 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i9-7960X) and C422 (Xeon W-2275).
| Feature | Core i9-7960X | Xeon W-2275 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666 | DDR4-2933+10% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1024 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 4 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 44 | 48+9% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-7960X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Core i9-7960X) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-2275). Primary use case: Xeon W-2275 targets Professional Content Creation / VFX. Direct competitor: Xeon W-2275 rivals Core i9-10940X.
| Feature | Core i9-7960X | Xeon W-2275 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | β | Professional Content Creation / VFX |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-7960X was priced at $1699, while the Xeon W-2275 came in at $1112. On launch pricing ($1699 vs $1112), Xeon W-2275 was $587 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-7960X delivers 16.5 pts/$ vs 25.2 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2275 β making the Xeon W-2275 the 41.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-7960X | Xeon W-2275 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1699 | $1112-35% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.5 | 25.2+53% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















