PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700T vs Core i9-7960X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700T vs Core i9-7960X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700T

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Costs $1,315 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 340.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 72.6 vs 16.5 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 165W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,611 vs 22,189).

Core i9-7960X

2017

Why buy it

✅+91.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅120% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.5 vs 72.6 PassMark/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
❌371.4% higher power demand at 165W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700T better than Core i9-7960X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-13700T is ahead with a 21.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-7960X pulls ahead with 91.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i7-13700T also has the bigger cache pool with 36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-7960X is the stronger fit. You are getting 91.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700T is the better buy right now. Core i7-13700T comes in $1,315 cheaper on MSRP at $384 MSRP versus $1,699 MSRP, and it still gives you a 21.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i9-7960X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 91.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 340.4% better value on MSRP (72.6 vs 16.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, and 36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13700T vs Core i9-7960X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700T

The Core i7-13700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,890 points. Launch price was $384.

Core i9-7960X

The Core i9-7960X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 28,020 points. Launch price was $1,699.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700T packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the Core i9-7960X's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-13700T versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7960X — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700T (base: 1.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-13700T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-7960X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700T scores 27,890 against the Core i9-7960X's 28,020 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i9-7960X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,611 vs 22,189 (62.6% advantage for the Core i9-7960X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,537 vs 1,394, a 58.2% lead for the Core i7-13700T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700T vs 22 MB (total) on the Core i9-7960X.

Feature	Core i7-13700T	Core i9-7960X
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	16 / 32
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+11%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.4 GHz	2.8 GHz+100%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+36%	22 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	27,890	28,020
Cinebench R23 Multi	11,611	22,189+91%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,537+82%	1,394
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,020	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-7960X uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700T versus 2666 on the Core i9-7960X — the Core i7-13700T supports 110.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700T supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700T) vs 4 (Core i9-7960X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700T) vs 44 (Core i9-7960X) — the Core i9-7960X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760,H770,H710 (Core i7-13700T) and X299 (Core i9-7960X).

Feature	Core i7-13700T	Core i9-7960X
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+110%	2666
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20	44+120%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-7960X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i9-7960X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700T) vs true (Core i9-7960X). The Core i7-13700T includes integrated graphics (UHD 770), while the Core i9-7960X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-13700T targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700T rivals Ryzen 7 7700.

Feature	Core i7-13700T	Core i9-7960X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD 770	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13700T was priced at $384, while the Core i9-7960X came in at $1699. On launch pricing ($384 vs $1699), Core i7-13700T was $1315 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700T delivers 72.6 pts/$ vs 16.5 pts/$ for the Core i9-7960X — making the Core i7-13700T the 126% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-13700T	Core i9-7960X
MSRP	$384-77%	$1699
Performance per Dollar	72.6+340%	16.5
Release Date	2023	2017

Search Core i7-13700T on Amazon

Search Core i9-7960X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.