
Core i7-13700T

Xeon E-2478
Core i7-13700T vs Xeon E-2478 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-13700T vs Xeon E-2478 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-13700T vs Xeon E-2478: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-13700T
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Costs $184 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $568 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 48.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 72.6 vs 48.9 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $568 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon E-2478
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,776 vs 27,890).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.9 vs 72.6 PassMark/$ ($568 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700T better than Xeon E-2478?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-13700T vs Xeon E-2478 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700T
The Core i7-13700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,890 points. Launch price was $384.

Xeon E-2478
The Xeon E-2478 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 27,776 points. Launch price was $568.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700T packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon E-2478 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-13700T versus 5.2 GHz on the Xeon E-2478 — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2478 (base: 1.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i7-13700T scores 27,890 against the Xeon E-2478's 27,776 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-13700T. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700T vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2478.
| Feature | Core i7-13700T | Xeon E-2478 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.2 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz+100% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+25% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 27,890 | 27,776 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,611 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,537 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,020 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700T versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon E-2478 — the Core i7-13700T supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700T supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i7-13700T | Xeon E-2478 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+17% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-13700T includes integrated graphics (UHD 770), while the Xeon E-2478 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-13700T targets Gaming, Xeon E-2478 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700T rivals Ryzen 7 7700.
| Feature | Core i7-13700T | Xeon E-2478 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-13700T was priced at $384, while the Xeon E-2478 came in at $568. On launch pricing ($384 vs $568), Core i7-13700T was $184 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700T delivers 72.6 pts/$ vs 48.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E-2478 — making the Core i7-13700T the 39% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700T | Xeon E-2478 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $384-32% | $568 |
| Performance per Dollar | 72.6+48% | 48.9 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















