Core i7-13700T vs Xeon E-2478

Intel

Core i7-13700T

16 Cores24 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2023
Core family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E-2478

8 Cores16 Thrd80 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-13700T vs Xeon E-2478 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700T vs Xeon E-2478 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700T vs Xeon E-2478: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700T

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
  • Costs $184 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $568 MSRP).
  • Delivers 48.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 72.6 vs 48.9 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $568 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E-2478

2023

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (27,776 vs 27,890).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.9 vs 72.6 PassMark/$ ($568 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
    • 128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i7-13700T better than Xeon E-2478?
    Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2478 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i7-13700T is the better buy right now. Core i7-13700T comes in $184 cheaper on MSRP at $384 MSRP versus $568 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 48.5% better value on MSRP (72.6 vs 48.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i7-13700T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Core i7-13700T vs Xeon E-2478 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i7-13700T

    The Core i7-13700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,890 points. Launch price was $384.

    Intel

    Xeon E-2478

    The Xeon E-2478 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 27,776 points. Launch price was $568.

    Processing Power

    The Core i7-13700T packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon E-2478 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-13700T versus 5.2 GHz on the Xeon E-2478 — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2478 (base: 1.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i7-13700T scores 27,890 against the Xeon E-2478's 27,776 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-13700T. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700T vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2478.

    FeatureCore i7-13700TXeon E-2478
    Cores / Threads
    16 / 24+100%
    8 / 16
    Boost Clock
    4.9 GHz
    5.2 GHz+6%
    Base Clock
    1.4 GHz
    2.8 GHz+100%
    L3 Cache
    30 MB (total)+25%
    24 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    2 MB (per core)
    2 MB (per core)
    Process
    Intel 7 nm
    Intel 7 nm
    Architecture
    Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
    Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
    PassMark
    27,890
    27,776
    Cinebench R23 Multi
    11,611
    Geekbench 6 Single
    2,537
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    15,020
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700T versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon E-2478 — the Core i7-13700T supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700T supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.

    FeatureCore i7-13700TXeon E-2478
    Socket
    LGA1700
    LGA1700
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0
    PCIe 5.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR5-5600+17%
    DDR5-4800
    Max RAM Capacity
    192 GB+50%
    128 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    Yes
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    20
    20
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-13700T includes integrated graphics (UHD 770), while the Xeon E-2478 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-13700T targets Gaming, Xeon E-2478 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700T rivals Ryzen 7 7700.

    FeatureCore i7-13700TXeon E-2478
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    No
    IGPU Model
    UHD 770
    Unlocked
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    VT-x, VT-d
    Target Use
    Gaming
    Server
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Core i7-13700T was priced at $384, while the Xeon E-2478 came in at $568. On launch pricing ($384 vs $568), Core i7-13700T was $184 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700T delivers 72.6 pts/$ vs 48.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E-2478 — making the Core i7-13700T the 39% better value option.

    FeatureCore i7-13700TXeon E-2478
    MSRP
    $384-32%
    $568
    Performance per Dollar
    72.6+48%
    48.9
    Release Date
    2023
    2023

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.