
Core i9-9820X

Xeon Gold 6334
Core i9-9820X vs Xeon Gold 6334 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-9820X vs Xeon Gold 6334 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-9820X vs Xeon Gold 6334: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-9820X
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6334 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,456 vs 20,512).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6334, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $889 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6334 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6334
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 44.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 44) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6334 better than Core i9-9820X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-9820X vs Xeon Gold 6334 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-9820X
The Core i9-9820X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 20,456 points. Launch price was $898.

Xeon Gold 6334
The Xeon Gold 6334 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,512 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i9-9820X packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6334 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-9820X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i9-9820X versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6334 — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-9820X (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i9-9820X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6334 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9820X scores 20,456 against the Xeon Gold 6334's 20,512 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6334. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total) on the Core i9-9820X vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6334.
| Feature | Core i9-9820X | Xeon Gold 6334 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+14% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 16.5 MB (total) | 18 MB (total)+9% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 20,456 | 20,512 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,394 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,361 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9820X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6334 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4 2666 MHz on the Core i9-9820X versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6334 — the Xeon Gold 6334 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6334 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 4700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i9-9820X) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6334). PCIe lanes: 44 (Core i9-9820X) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6334) — the Xeon Gold 6334 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel X299 (Core i9-9820X) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6334).
| Feature | Core i9-9820X | Xeon Gold 6334 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4 2666 MHz | 3200+20% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 6144 GB+4700% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 44 | 64+45% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-9820X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Core i9-9820X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6334). Primary use case: Core i9-9820X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6334 rivals EPYC 72F3.
| Feature | Core i9-9820X | Xeon Gold 6334 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














