Core i9-9900T vs Xeon E5-2650 v4
Core i9-9900T
Xeon E5-2650 v4
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i9-9900T
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2650 v4
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i9-9900T | Xeon E5-2650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($215) | ✅ More affordable ($45) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-EP (2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i9-9900T | Xeon E5-2650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+381%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($215) | ✅ More affordable ($45) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-9900T and Xeon E5-2650 v4
Core i9-9900T
The Core i9-9900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,208 points. Launch price was $439.
Xeon E5-2650 v4
The Xeon E5-2650 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,290 points. Launch price was $1,166.
Processing Power
The Core i9-9900T packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2650 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-9900T versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 v4 — a 41.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-9900T (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i9-9900T uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9900T scores 13,208 against the Xeon E5-2650 v4's 13,290 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2650 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9900T vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650 v4.
| Feature | Core i9-9900T | Xeon E5-2650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+52% | 2.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.2 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+88% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Broadwell-EP (2016) |
| PassMark | 13,208 | 13,290 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9900T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-9900T | Xeon E5-2650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1536 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-9900T) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2650 v4). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2650 v4 targets Server.
| Feature | Core i9-9900T | Xeon E5-2650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-9900T launched at $423 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2650 v4 debuted at $1166. At current prices ($215 vs $45), the Xeon E5-2650 v4 is $170 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-9900T delivers 61.4 pts/$ vs 295.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2650 v4 — making the Xeon E5-2650 v4 the 131.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-9900T | Xeon E5-2650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $423-64% | $1166 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $215 | $45-79% |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.4 | 295.3+381% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i9-9900T and Xeon E5-2650 v4
