
Core i9-9920X

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Core i9-9920X vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-9920X vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-9920X vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-9920X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 180W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,974 vs 25,148).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 38.7 PassMark/$ ($1,189 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $540 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 84.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.7 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($649 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 2920X better than Core i9-9920X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-9920X vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-9920X
The Core i9-9920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,974 points. Launch price was $1,189.


Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,148 points. Launch price was $649.
Processing Power
Both the Core i9-9920X and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-9920X versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X — a 4.5% clock advantage for the Core i9-9920X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i9-9920X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses ZEN+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9920X scores 24,974 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X's 25,148 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-9920X vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
| Feature | Core i9-9920X | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+5% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total) | 32 MB+66% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | ZEN+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 24,974 | 25,148 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9920X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-9920X | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-9920X was priced at $1189, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X came in at $649. On launch pricing ($1189 vs $649), Ryzen Threadripper 2920X was $540 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-9920X delivers 21.0 pts/$ vs 38.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X the 59.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-9920X | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1189 | $649-45% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.0 | 38.7+84% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














