
Core i5-14400
Popular choices:

Core i9-9920X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-14400
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $968 less on MSRP ($221 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 445.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.6 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($221 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i9-9920X
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,974 vs 25,329).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 114.6 PassMark/$ ($1,189 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i5-14400 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-14400
2024Core i9-9920X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $968 less on MSRP ($221 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 445.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.6 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($221 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,974 vs 25,329).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 114.6 PassMark/$ ($1,189 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i5-14400 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-14400 better than Core i9-9920X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-14400 | Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-14400 | Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 466 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 457 FPS | 438 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 288 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 244 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 193 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-14400 | Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 624 FPS |
| medium | 610 FPS | 547 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 499 FPS |
| ultra | 458 FPS | 435 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 577 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 411 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 444 FPS |
| medium | 412 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 268 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-14400 | Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 624 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 624 FPS |
| high | 633 FPS | 624 FPS |
| ultra | 596 FPS | 624 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 624 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 624 FPS |
| high | 565 FPS | 624 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 620 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 515 FPS | 624 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 521 FPS |
| ultra | 363 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-14400 and Core i9-9920X

Core i5-14400
Core i5-14400
The Core i5-14400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,329 points. Launch price was $221.

Core i9-9920X
Core i9-9920X
The Core i9-9920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,974 points. Launch price was $1,189.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14400 packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i9-9920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i9-9920X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i5-14400 versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-9920X — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-14400 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-14400 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-9920X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14400 scores 25,329 against the Core i9-9920X's 24,974 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i5-14400. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-14400 vs 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-9920X.
| Feature | Core i5-14400 | Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 12 / 24+20% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+4% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+4% | 19.25 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 25,329+1% | 24,974 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14400 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-9920X uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-14400 | Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-14400 launched at $221 MSRP, while the Core i9-9920X debuted at $1189. On MSRP ($221 vs $1189), the Core i5-14400 is $968 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-14400 delivers 114.6 pts/$ vs 21.0 pts/$ for the Core i9-9920X — making the Core i5-14400 the 138% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-14400 | Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $221-81% | $1189 |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.6+446% | 21.0 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













