
Core i5-14400

Core i9-12900HK
Core i5-14400 vs Core i9-12900HK Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-14400 vs Core i9-12900HK FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-14400 vs Core i9-12900HK: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-14400
2024Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900HK across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,329 vs 25,512).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $221 MSRP, while Core i9-12900HK mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Core i9-12900HK
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EUs), while Core i5-14400 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-12900HK better than Core i5-14400?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-14400 vs Core i9-12900HK Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-14400
The Core i5-14400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,329 points. Launch price was $221.

Core i9-12900HK
The Core i9-12900HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,512 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14400 packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i9-12900HK offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-12900HK has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i5-14400 versus 5 GHz on the Core i9-12900HK — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-12900HK (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-14400 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-12900HK uses Alder Lake-H (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14400 scores 25,329 against the Core i9-12900HK's 25,512 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i9-12900HK. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-14400 vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900HK.
| Feature | Core i5-14400 | Core i9-12900HK |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 14 / 20+40% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 5 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Alder Lake-H (2022) |
| PassMark | 25,329 | 25,512 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,197 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,938 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 13,317 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14400 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-12900HK uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-14400 | Core i9-12900HK |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-14400) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-12900HK). The Core i9-12900HK includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EUs)), while the Core i5-14400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-12900HK targets Enthusiast Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i9-12900HK rivals Ryzen 9 6900HX.
| Feature | Core i5-14400 | Core i9-12900HK |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EUs) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Enthusiast Gaming Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














