Core i5-14400 vs EPYC 7272

Core i5-14400 vs EPYC 7272 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-14400

10 / 16

25,329

+0.7%

25,161

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-14400 vs EPYC 7272 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-14400 vs EPYC 7272: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-14400

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7272, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $221 MSRP, while EPYC 7272 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

EPYC 7272

2019

Why buy it

✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14400 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,161 vs 25,329).
❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i5-14400 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-14400 better than EPYC 7272?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7272 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-14400 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-14400 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-14400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-14400 is the better buy right now. Core i5-14400 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $221 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (114.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-14400 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/24. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-14400 vs EPYC 7272 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-14400

The Core i5-14400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,329 points. Launch price was $221.

EPYC 7272

The EPYC 7272 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,161 points. Launch price was $625.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-14400 packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 7272 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7272 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i5-14400 versus 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7272 — a 38% clock advantage for the Core i5-14400 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-14400 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7272 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14400 scores 25,329 against the EPYC 7272's 25,161 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-14400. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-14400 vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7272.

Feature	Core i5-14400	EPYC 7272
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	12 / 24+20%
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+47%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.9 GHz+16%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+60%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark	25,329	25,161

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-14400 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7272 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.