
Core i5-14400

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Core i5-14400 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-14400 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-14400 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-14400
2024Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $428 less on MSRP ($221 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 195.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.6 vs 38.7 PassMark/$ ($221 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,148 vs 25,329).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.7 vs 114.6 PassMark/$ ($649 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core i5-14400 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-14400 better than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-14400 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-14400
The Core i5-14400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,329 points. Launch price was $221.


Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,148 points. Launch price was $649.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14400 packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i5-14400 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X — a 8.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-14400 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-14400 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses ZEN+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14400 scores 25,329 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X's 25,148 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-14400. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-14400 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
| Feature | Core i5-14400 | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 12 / 24+20% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+9% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 32 MB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+40860% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-42% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | ZEN+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 25,329 | 25,148 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14400 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-14400 | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-14400 was priced at $221, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X came in at $649. On launch pricing ($221 vs $649), Core i5-14400 was $428 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-14400 delivers 114.6 pts/$ vs 38.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X — making the Core i5-14400 the 98.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-14400 | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $221-66% | $649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.6+196% | 38.7 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














