Core i9-9940X vs Xeon W-2275

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-9940X vs Xeon W-2275 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-9940X vs Xeon W-2275: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-9940X

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2275 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2275, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.3 vs 25.2 PassMark/$ ($1,387 MSRP vs $1,112 MSRP).

Xeon W-2275

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 44.
✅Costs $275 less on MSRP ($1,112 MSRP vs $1,387 MSRP).
✅Delivers 24.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.2 vs 20.3 PassMark/$ ($1,112 MSRP vs $1,387 MSRP).
✅9.1% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 44) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (27,974 vs 28,088).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2275 better than Core i9-9940X?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-2275 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-9940X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-9940X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2275 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-2275 comes in $275 cheaper on MSRP at $1,112 MSRP versus $1,387 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i9-9940X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 24.2% better value on MSRP (25.2 vs 20.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-2275 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i9-9940X vs Xeon W-2275 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-9940X

The Core i9-9940X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 28,088 points. Launch price was $1,387.

Xeon W-2275

The Xeon W-2275 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,974 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i9-9940X and Xeon W-2275 share an identical 14-core/28-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-9940X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-2275 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2275 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i9-9940X is built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i9-9940X scores 28,088 against the Xeon W-2275's 27,974 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i9-9940X. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-9940X vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon W-2275.

Feature	Core i9-9940X	Xeon W-2275
Cores / Threads	14 / 28	14 / 28
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz	4.8 GHz+7%
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	19.25 MB (total)	19.25 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	—
PassMark	28,088	27,974
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	19,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,596
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2066 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i9-9940X versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-2275 — the Xeon W-2275 supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2275 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 44 (Core i9-9940X) vs 48 (Xeon W-2275) — the Xeon W-2275 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i9-9940X	Xeon W-2275
Socket	LGA2066	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2933+10%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1024 GB+700%
RAM Channels	4	4
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	44	48+9%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-9940X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-9940X) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-2275). Primary use case: Core i9-9940X targets Workstation, Xeon W-2275 targets Professional Content Creation / VFX. Direct competitor: Xeon W-2275 rivals Core i9-10940X.

Feature	Core i9-9940X	Xeon W-2275
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Workstation	Professional Content Creation / VFX

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-9940X was priced at $1387, while the Xeon W-2275 came in at $1112. On launch pricing ($1387 vs $1112), Xeon W-2275 was $275 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-9940X delivers 20.3 pts/$ vs 25.2 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2275 — making the Xeon W-2275 the 21.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-9940X	Xeon W-2275
MSRP	$1387	$1112-20%
Performance per Dollar	20.3	25.2+24%
Release Date	2018	2019

Search Core i9-9940X on Amazon

Search Xeon W-2275 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.