
Core i9-9980XE

Ryzen 9 270
Core i9-9980XE vs Ryzen 9 270 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-9980XE vs Ryzen 9 270 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-9980XE vs Ryzen 9 270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-9980XE
2018Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅120% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 270 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,979 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 270 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌266.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 270 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 270 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 270
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 165W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Core i9-9980XE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,500 vs 22,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 270 better than Core i9-9980XE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-9980XE vs Ryzen 9 270 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-9980XE
The Core i9-9980XE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 29,127 points. Launch price was $1,979.


Ryzen 9 270
The Ryzen 9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,602 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-9980XE packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Ryzen 9 270 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-9980XE has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-9980XE versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 270 — a 14.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 270 (base: 3 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i9-9980XE uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 270 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9980XE scores 29,127 against the Ryzen 9 270's 29,602 — a 1.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 270. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 22,000 vs 16,500 (28.6% advantage for the Core i9-9980XE). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,459 vs 2,636, a 57.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 270 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,177 vs 13,000 (6.5% advantage for the Ryzen 9 270). L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total) on the Core i9-9980XE vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 270.
| Feature | Core i9-9980XE | Ryzen 9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 18 / 36+125% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 5.2 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 4 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 24.75 MB (total)+55% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 29,127 | 29,602+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 22,000+33% | 16,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,459 | 2,636+81% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,177 | 13,000+7% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9980XE uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 270 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i9-9980XE versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 270 — the Ryzen 9 270 supports 110.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 270 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i9-9980XE) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 270). PCIe lanes: 44 (Core i9-9980XE) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 270) — the Core i9-9980XE offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i9-9980XE) and FP8 platform (Ryzen 9 270).
| Feature | Core i9-9980XE | Ryzen 9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-5600+110% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 44+120% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-9980XE) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 9 270). The Ryzen 9 270 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Core i9-9980XE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-9980XE targets HEDT / Workstation / Content Creation, Ryzen 9 270 targets Professional Content Creation Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i9-9980XE rivals Ryzen Threadripper 2950X; Ryzen 9 270 rivals Core i9-13900H.
| Feature | Core i9-9980XE | Ryzen 9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | HEDT / Workstation / Content Creation | Professional Content Creation Laptop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-9980XE was priced at $1979, while the Ryzen 9 270 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($1979 vs $0), Ryzen 9 270 was $1979 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i9-9980XE | Ryzen 9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1979 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.7 | — |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













