Core M-5Y10a vs Celeron M P4600
Core M-5Y10a
Celeron M P4600
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core M-5Y10a is positioned at rank 1166 and the Celeron M P4600 is on rank 836, so the Celeron M P4600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core M-5Y10a
Performance Per Dollar Celeron M P4600
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core M-5Y10a | Celeron M P4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-Y (2014) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core M-5Y10a | Celeron M P4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1755%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core M-5Y10a and Celeron M P4600
Core M-5Y10a
The Core M-5Y10a is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,905 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron M P4600
The Celeron M P4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,886 points. Launch price was $86.
Processing Power
The Core M-5Y10a packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron M P4600's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core M-5Y10a versus 2 GHz on the Celeron M P4600 — identical boost frequencies. The Core M-5Y10a uses the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron M P4600 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core M-5Y10a scores 1,905 against the Celeron M P4600's 1,886 — a 1% lead for the Core M-5Y10a. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y10a vs 2 MB on the Celeron M P4600.
| Feature | Core M-5Y10a | Celeron M P4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 0.8 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total)+100% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB+100% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell-Y (2014) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,905+1% | 1,886 |
Memory & Platform
The Core M-5Y10a uses the FCBGA1234 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron M P4600 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core M-5Y10a | Celeron M P4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1234 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core M-5Y10a) / not specified (Celeron M P4600). The Core M-5Y10a includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 5300), while the Celeron M P4600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core M-5Y10a targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core M-5Y10a | Celeron M P4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 5300 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Value Analysis
The Core M-5Y10a launched at $281 MSRP, while the Celeron M P4600 debuted at $86. At current prices ($281 vs $15), the Celeron M P4600 is $266 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core M-5Y10a delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 125.7 pts/$ for the Celeron M P4600 — making the Celeron M P4600 the 179.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core M-5Y10a | Celeron M P4600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $281 | $86-69% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $281 | $15-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8 | 125.7+1749% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core M-5Y10a and Celeron M P4600
