
Core M-5Y10a vs Celeron G1850

Core M-5Y10a

Celeron G1850
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core M-5Y10a is positioned at rank 1166 and the Celeron G1850 is on rank 450, so the Celeron G1850 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core M-5Y10a
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1850
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core M-5Y10a | Celeron G1850 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($30) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-Y (2014) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core M-5Y10a | Celeron G1850 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+838%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core M-5Y10a and Celeron G1850

Core M-5Y10a
The Core M-5Y10a is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,905 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron G1850
The Celeron G1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,907 points. Launch price was $101.
Processing Power
The Core M-5Y10a packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G1850's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core M-5Y10a versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G1850 — a 36.7% clock advantage for the Celeron G1850 (base: 0.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core M-5Y10a uses the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G1850 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core M-5Y10a scores 1,905 against the Celeron G1850's 1,907 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G1850. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y10a vs 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1850.
| Feature | Core M-5Y10a | Celeron G1850 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.9 GHz+45% |
| Base Clock | 0.8 GHz | 2.9 GHz+262% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total)+33% | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell-Y (2014) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 1,905 | 1,907 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 543 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 945 |
Memory & Platform
The Core M-5Y10a uses the FCBGA1234 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G1850 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR3-1600 memory speed. The Celeron G1850 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core M-5Y10a) vs 16 (Celeron G1850) — the Celeron G1850 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core M-5Y10a | Celeron G1850 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1234 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR3-1600 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 16+33% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core M-5Y10a) vs VT-x (Celeron G1850). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 5300 (Core M-5Y10a) and HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1850) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core M-5Y10a targets Mobile, Celeron G1850 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1850 rivals Pentium G3258.
| Feature | Core M-5Y10a | Celeron G1850 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 5300 | HD Graphics (Haswell) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x |
| Target Use | Mobile | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core M-5Y10a launched at $281 MSRP, while the Celeron G1850 debuted at $42. At current prices ($281 vs $30), the Celeron G1850 is $251 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core M-5Y10a delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 63.6 pts/$ for the Celeron G1850 — making the Celeron G1850 the 161.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core M-5Y10a | Celeron G1850 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $281 | $42-85% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $281 | $30-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8 | 63.6+835% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















