Celeron G1850 vs Core M-5Y10a

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1850 vs Core M-5Y10a FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1850 vs Core M-5Y10a: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1850

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $239 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 569.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.4 vs 6.8 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Draws 54W instead of 512W, a 458W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).

Core M-5Y10a

2014

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,905 vs 1,907).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 45.4 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌848.1% higher power demand at 512W vs 54W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1850 better than Core M-5Y10a?

Yes. Celeron G1850 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G1850 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1850 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1850 is the better buy right now. Celeron G1850 comes in $239 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 569.8% better value on MSRP (45.4 vs 6.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core M-5Y10a is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Celeron G1850 vs Core M-5Y10a Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1850

The Celeron G1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,907 points. Launch price was $101.

Core M-5Y10a

The Core M-5Y10a is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,905 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G1850 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core M-5Y10a's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G1850 versus 2 GHz on the Core M-5Y10a — a 36.7% clock advantage for the Celeron G1850 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 0.8 GHz). The Celeron G1850 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core M-5Y10a uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1850 scores 1,907 against the Core M-5Y10a's 1,905 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G1850. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1850 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y10a.

Feature	Celeron G1850	Core M-5Y10a
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+45%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+262%	0.8 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Broadwell-Y (2014)
PassMark	1,907	1,905
Geekbench 6 Single	543	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	945	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1850 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core M-5Y10a uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1850 versus LPDDR3-1600 on the Core M-5Y10a — the Core M-5Y10a supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1850 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G1850) vs 12 (Core M-5Y10a) — the Celeron G1850 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Celeron G1850	Core M-5Y10a
Socket	LGA1150	FCBGA1234
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	LPDDR3-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1850) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core M-5Y10a). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1850) and HD Graphics 5300 (Core M-5Y10a) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1850 targets Budget, Core M-5Y10a targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron G1850 rivals Pentium G3258.

Feature	Celeron G1850	Core M-5Y10a
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Haswell)	HD Graphics 5300
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Budget	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G1850 was priced at $42, while the Core M-5Y10a came in at $281. On launch pricing ($42 vs $281), Celeron G1850 was $239 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1850 delivers 45.4 pts/$ vs 6.8 pts/$ for the Core M-5Y10a — making the Celeron G1850 the 148% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G1850	Core M-5Y10a
MSRP	$42-85%	$281
Performance per Dollar	45.4+568%	6.8
Release Date	2014	2014

Search Celeron G1850 on Amazon

Search Core M-5Y10a on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.