
Core M-5Y10a

Pentium G2130
Core M-5Y10a vs Pentium G2130 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core M-5Y10a vs Pentium G2130 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Cyberpunk 2077
Core M-5Y10a vs Pentium G2130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core M-5Y10a
2014Why buy it
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 5300, while Pentium G2130 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (1,905 vs 1,915).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 25.5 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
- β830.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 55W.
Pentium G2130
2013Why buy it
- β Costs $206 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- β Delivers 276.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.5 vs 6.8 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- β Draws 55W instead of 512W, a 457W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core M-5Y10a can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G2130 better than Core M-5Y10a?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core M-5Y10a vs Pentium G2130 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core M-5Y10a
The Core M-5Y10a is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,905 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium G2130
The Pentium G2130 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3072 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,915 points. Launch price was $90.
Processing Power
The Core M-5Y10a packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium G2130's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core M-5Y10a versus 3.2 GHz on the Pentium G2130 β a 46.2% clock advantage for the Pentium G2130 (base: 0.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core M-5Y10a uses the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium G2130 uses Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core M-5Y10a scores 1,905 against the Pentium G2130's 1,915 β a 0.5% lead for the Pentium G2130. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y10a vs 3072 kB (total) on the Pentium G2130.
| Feature | Core M-5Y10a | Pentium G2130 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 3.2 GHz+60% |
| Base Clock | 0.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz+300% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total)+33% | 3072 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell-Y (2014) | Ivy Bridge (2012β2013) |
| PassMark | 1,905 | 1,915 |
Memory & Platform
The Core M-5Y10a uses the FCBGA1234 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G2130 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core M-5Y10a | Pentium G2130 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1234 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR3-1600 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core M-5Y10a) / not specified (Pentium G2130). The Core M-5Y10a includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 5300), while the Pentium G2130 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core M-5Y10a targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core M-5Y10a | Pentium G2130 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 5300 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
| Target Use | Mobile | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core M-5Y10a was priced at $281, while the Pentium G2130 came in at $75. On launch pricing ($281 vs $75), Pentium G2130 was $206 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core M-5Y10a delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 25.5 pts/$ for the Pentium G2130 β making the Pentium G2130 the 116.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core M-5Y10a | Pentium G2130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $281 | $75-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8 | 25.5+275% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














