Core i5-560M
VS
Core M-5Y10a

Core i5-560M vs Core M-5Y10a

Intel

Core i5-560M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core M-5Y10a

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-560M is positioned at rank 1121 and the Core M-5Y10a is on rank 1166, so the Core i5-560M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-560M

#1109
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3485%
#1110
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3433%
#1111
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3152%
#1112
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3138%
#1113
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3109%
#1115
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3002%
#1116
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2879%
#1117
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2874%
#1118
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2797%
#1121
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
100%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
98%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
98%
#1127
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
98%
#1128
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
98%
#1129
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
98%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
97%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
97%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1133
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
96%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
92%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core M-5Y10a

#1154
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4327%
#1155
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4264%
#1156
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3914%
#1157
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3897%
#1158
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3861%
#1160
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3729%
#1161
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3575%
#1162
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3569%
#1163
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3473%
#1166
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1167
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
100%
#1168
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
98%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
96%
#1177
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
96%
#1178
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
96%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
95%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
95%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-560M leads in gaming performance. However, the Core M-5Y10a is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-560MCore M-5Y10a
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($225)
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-Y (2014) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i5-560M stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 20% cheaper ($225 vs $281) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i5-560MCore M-5Y10a
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+24%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($225)
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-560M and Core M-5Y10a

Intel

Core i5-560M

The Core i5-560M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,894 points. Launch price was $225.

Intel

Core M-5Y10a

The Core M-5Y10a is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,905 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-560M and Core M-5Y10a share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-560M versus 2 GHz on the Core M-5Y10a — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-560M (base: 2.66 GHz vs 0.8 GHz). The Core i5-560M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core M-5Y10a uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-560M scores 1,894 against the Core M-5Y10a's 1,905 — a 0.6% lead for the Core M-5Y10a. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-560M vs 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y10a.

FeatureCore i5-560MCore M-5Y10a
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+60%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2.66 GHz+233%
0.8 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Broadwell-Y (2014)
PassMark
1,894
1,905
Geekbench 6 Single
450
Geekbench 6 Multi
950
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-560M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core M-5Y10a uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Core M-5Y10a supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-560M) vs 12 (Core M-5Y10a) — the Core i5-560M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i5-560MCore M-5Y10a
Socket
PGA988
FCBGA1234
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
LPDDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Westmere) (Core i5-560M) and HD Graphics 5300 (Core M-5Y10a) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-560M targets Laptop, Core M-5Y10a targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-560M rivals AMD Turion II Ultra M660.

FeatureCore i5-560MCore M-5Y10a
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)
HD Graphics 5300
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Laptop
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-560M launched at $225 MSRP, while the Core M-5Y10a debuted at $281.

FeatureCore i5-560MCore M-5Y10a
MSRP
$225-20%
$281
Avg Price (30d)
$281
Release Date
2010
2014