
Core i5-560M

Core M-5Y70
Core i5-560M vs Core M-5Y70 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-560M vs Core M-5Y70 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-560M vs Core M-5Y70: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-560M
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $56 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.4 vs 6.7 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Westmere), while Core M-5Y70 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
Core M-5Y70
2014Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,890 vs 1,894).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-560M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-560M better than Core M-5Y70?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-560M vs Core M-5Y70 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-560M
The Core i5-560M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,894 points. Launch price was $225.

Core M-5Y70
The Core M-5Y70 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,890 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-560M and Core M-5Y70 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-560M versus 2.6 GHz on the Core M-5Y70 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-560M (base: 2.66 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core i5-560M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core M-5Y70 uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-560M scores 1,894 against the Core M-5Y70's 1,890 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-560M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-560M vs 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y70.
| Feature | Core i5-560M | Core M-5Y70 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+23% | 2.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.66 GHz+142% | 1.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 4 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Broadwell-Y (2014) |
| PassMark | 1,894 | 1,890 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 450 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 950 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-560M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core M-5Y70 uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-560M | Core M-5Y70 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | FCBGA1234 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-560M) / not specified (Core M-5Y70). The Core i5-560M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)), while the Core M-5Y70 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-560M targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-560M rivals AMD Turion II Ultra M660.
| Feature | Core i5-560M | Core M-5Y70 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Westmere) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-560M was priced at $225, while the Core M-5Y70 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($225 vs $281), Core i5-560M was $56 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-560M delivers 8.4 pts/$ vs 6.7 pts/$ for the Core M-5Y70 — making the Core i5-560M the 22.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-560M | Core M-5Y70 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $225-20% | $281 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.4+25% | 6.7 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














