
Athlon 5370

Core i5-560M
Athlon 5370 vs Core i5-560M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 5370 vs Core i5-560M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 5370 vs Core i5-560M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 5370
2014Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $170 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- β Delivers 311.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.7 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($55 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- β Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Core i5-560M.
Trade-offs
- βLower Geekbench multi-core (636 vs 950).
Core i5-560M
2010Why buy it
- β +49.4% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- β 300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon 5370 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 34.7 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- β40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 5370.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon 5370 better than Core i5-560M?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 5370 vs Core i5-560M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 5370
The Athlon 5370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013β2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,906 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-560M
The Core i5-560M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010β2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,894 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Athlon 5370 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-560M offers 2 cores / 4 threads β the Athlon 5370 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 5370 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-560M β a 37% clock advantage for the Core i5-560M (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Athlon 5370 uses the Kabini (2013β2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-560M uses Arrandale (2010β2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 5370 scores 1,906 against the Core i5-560M's 1,894 β a 0.6% lead for the Athlon 5370. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 247 vs 450, a 58.2% lead for the Core i5-560M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 636 vs 950 (39.6% advantage for the Core i5-560M).
| Feature | Athlon 5370 | Core i5-560M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz+45% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.66 GHz+21% |
| L3 Cache | β | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+700% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-13% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kabini (2013β2014) | Arrandale (2010β2011) |
| PassMark | 1,906 | 1,894 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 247 | 450+82% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 636 | 950+49% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 5370 uses the AM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-560M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Athlon 5370 versus DDR3-1066 on the Core i5-560M β the Athlon 5370 supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 5370 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon 5370) vs 2 (Core i5-560M). PCIe lanes: 4 (Athlon 5370) vs 16 (Core i5-560M) β the Core i5-560M offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM1,A50M (Athlon 5370) and HM55,HM57,PM55,QM57 (Core i5-560M).
| Feature | Athlon 5370 | Core i5-560M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM1 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600+50% | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 16+300% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon 5370) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-560M). Both include integrated graphics β Radeon R3 (Athlon 5370) and Intel HD Graphics (Westmere) (Core i5-560M) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 5370 targets Budget, Core i5-560M targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-560M rivals AMD Turion II Ultra M660.
| Feature | Athlon 5370 | Core i5-560M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R3 | Intel HD Graphics (Westmere) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Budget | Laptop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon 5370 was priced at $55, while the Core i5-560M came in at $225. On launch pricing ($55 vs $225), Athlon 5370 was $170 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 5370 delivers 34.7 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-560M β making the Athlon 5370 the 121.8% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 5370 | Core i5-560M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-76% | $225 |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.7+313% | 8.4 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















